scubadobadoo
Contributor
True. Man those guys cook some yummie looking stuff! I am not real pleased with the shark fin soup he is also making, but the trout looks awesome.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Smay28, how were their rigs were out of control?smay28:Pretty much harassment in my eyes. Maybe giving it a nudge once or twice to prompt some movement for the camera but holding on to it and restricting it's movement is uncalled for.
Did you see all the gear on those guys?!?.. Those rigs were out of control..
KimLeece:I totally disagree with harrassing marine life. People who catch puffer fish in order to blow them up are my greatest irritation - and I see that a lot in Japan. I don't understand why some seem to think that they have a right to totally stress other life - just for kicks. Why they can't just look and feel privileged to be there in the first place is beyond me. If you visit someone elses house - do you re-arrange their furniture and man-handle their family? I think not! So why do it U/W? I suppose some will say that it does no real harm - but how would they react if someone else messed with them - or their wife - or their kids? Live and let live - and do unto others as you would be done by!
Straw argument.kelpermaid:But the problem I have with it is that this is still killing something for the entertainment value it provides. While I'm not a vegetarian, neither do I attend cockfights.
I hope they didn't throw that poor dog overboard to see if he could swim back to the mainland.
Why do you employ mercenary animal death squads to kill animals so you can tear their muscle and sinew and crush it with your mandibles and eat their scorched flesh?kelpermaid:If an instructor "opens" the urchin to feed the garibaldis to show off to students, yes, he or she is killing it for entertainment. Why not just leave the animals alone to feed themselves, and observe their natural behavior? It is just as much fun to watch the garibaldi guard his nest.
It looks like this jackass pulled the video from his site...If anyone is interested in a copy drop me a PM. We can work something out....he is a REALLY ARROGANT *******.
Isn't calling people names and using hate speech a violation of the board rules? Or are the rules selectively applied to silence only certain people? Aren't the videographic images copyright protected, and disseminating such without the express written consent of the holder a crime AND a tort? If you are using the board to engage in a criminal enterprise, aren't you running the risk of drawing the board owners in as potential defendents if they affirmatively allow the illegal activity?TomR1:...you are definitely ****ed up dude.
So your point is...? Oh, I think I get it - you don't have an opinion on the topic - you're just trying to start an argument. Woops! wrong again - you're just taking the higher moral ground as you did in your debating class.RebreatherBoy:Tom1R, in debate class we called what you just did a straw argument....it was always seen by all as the intellectual equivalent of throwing in the towel.
Rather then misdefining my argument, why not just answer it, unless of course you actually eventually get my point, and that is many of you are throwing stones in glass houses.
KimLeece, so when the Angel sharks remain close so as to be able to be grabbed again, then this is a barometer of the animal indicating it is not being bothered, to use your weak, self-serving analogy? Did you ever think of first checking with a icthyological opthomologist to see what it does to the rods and cones in the eyes of light sensitive fish?
My opinion about whether grabbing the shark is accpetable is irrelevant, I would rather ask questions to the comment posters....