Didn't think it would work but I tried.
What? A few posts ago you were encouraging more responses claiming you enjoyed the free adverts.
Has that changed?
Now try to imagine that 4-5 pages ago when a *customer* expressed concerns about claimed capacity you'd simply replied "Interesting, I'll check that out" (or similar)
I'll venture a guess you could have avoided calling me vulgar names without cause.........
A bit of history: When I got in this business I did some research. In part to try and discover how manufacturers decided what wing capacities were necessary, and in part to discover who these capacities were measured.
The first issue left me dumbstruck. No one, I mean NO one including the heads of tech training agencies could provide me with a quantitative means of determining required capacity. All I could find was empirically derived answers, "With heavy dual l104's you need at least XX lbs of lift" That lead me to develop my own process.
As to the second issue, rated capacity and how it was measured, I discovered that most of the sample wings I could get my hands on offered their rated capacity only when inflated in the free state, i.e. not mounted to a plate with a cylinder or cylinders attached. When assembled into a rig the available capacity was often 4-5-6- lbs less. I visited a local fabricator and asked how they determine capacity. They showed me a jacket BC being filled with water in the parking lot. They proudly told me they did the same for all of their bcs. I asked it they had any back plates or cylinders on hand. They looked at me funny, nope not one, no idea why that might matter. I wasn't sure they knew what a back plate was. Keep in mind that wings remain a tiny percentage of scuba inflatables, the typical contract cut and sew shop would die if they only made wings.
The scuba industry is one where most brands (marketing companies) make almost nothing in house. Nothing wrong with that. It can be wise to seek vendors with specific expertise, and spread the risk of capital investment in tools and equipment. This model works fine if the "general contractor" understands the final product and specifies (and verifies) exactly what each spoke in the manufacturing wheel needs to. Often the marketing company assumes the vendors have greater expertise than they really do, and the vendor assumes the marketing company just needs a variation on their basic product and the result a gap in the specifications.
There was a major brand that ~8-9 years ago decided to get into the back plate and wing business. Their first back plates had camband slots, but none of their singles wings had any camband slots at all, (oddly all of their doubles wings had slots) and their product line did not include a single tank adapter. The net result was if you wanted a Brand X singles rig you needed to buy a 3rd party STA to make it all work! How does this happen? Simple, the buyer sent a backplate to a metal fabricator and asked them to alter / duplicate it. The buyer sent a single wing to a cut and sew shop with the same instructions. Both shops did their job in isolation, with no idea how the final assembly was supposed to fit together. The buyer at brand X assumed the two vendors were experts after all......
This is the type of thing I was trying to help you avoid. I now know better than to offer you any help ever...
Good luck,
Tobin