A year later, and I still stand behind this assertion.Pure strokery. I would not/could not dive that configuration. How many points of failure are there in this setup?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
A year later, and I still stand behind this assertion.Pure strokery. I would not/could not dive that configuration. How many points of failure are there in this setup?
Their rebreather design is the same as a GUE boat rig, just based around the SF2 instead of the JJ.Listened to another UTD podcast today “Unified Teem Diving Podcast #99 - advanced rebreather training- Ben’s talk art DEMA”
They are now talking about using their “DIR” principles being applied to rebreathers.
I need to listen to it again, this time not screaming at the radio (iPhone playing through the car stereo).
I really have a problem with people trying to argue that you can only have one way of doing things, i.e. long & necklaced hoses on a rebreather.
I inferred from this podcast that UTD are looking at large cylinders on CCR obliterating the main advantage of a lighter backmount unit and flexible gases. Maybe that podcast was videoed.
Interesting rebreather choice. The proven, flexible and highly regarded JJ vs the low volume and quirky SF2 with counterlungs around the diver's backside for maximum WOB when out of trim.Their rebreather design is the same as a GUE boat rig, just based around the SF2 instead of the JJ.
Lola valved 50s around a vertical scrubber.
See what they make of the SF2 when they’re in a current deeper than 80m (especially with that extra drag they’re engineering)Interesting rebreather choice. The proven, flexible and highly regarded JJ vs the low volume and quirky SF2 with counterlungs around the diver's backside for maximum WOB when out of trim.
Almost as if they chose a self contained rebreather because it wasn't a GUE JJ.
Why would you consider the SF2 quirky? I love mine. No, I'm not DIR, but I wouldn't mind a DIR answer. In fact, I would prefer it.and quirky SF2
The SF2 is essentially an eCCR version of the RB80 so doesn't surprise me at all that UTD chose it for their platform.Interesting rebreather choice. The proven, flexible and highly regarded JJ vs the low volume and quirky SF2 with counterlungs around the diver's backside for maximum WOB when out of trim.
Almost as if they chose a self contained rebreather because it wasn't a GUE JJ.