Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
It would be hard to get an estimate lower than mine. I am pretty sure my estimate is within a plus or minus range of 1% to reality, but then, my estimate is that it is fewer than 1%. When I taught OW classes, I always asked students why they wanted to learn to dive and what their future plans were. Almost all were focused on a specific upcoming vacation trip, and I cannot even remember hearing new students talk about any significant plans beyond the most basic.What percentage of new-ish divers have a vision of "down the road" other than to continue diving and having fun? I really don't know, but maybe it's lower than we think.
This debate says more about the peculiarities of ScubaBoard than the reality of the outside world. The rest of the diving world pretty much doesn't care.If someone had told me, when I asked how to improve my recreational diving, that I should take into account things like the agency's approach to "Ratio Deco" before deciding on GUE versus UTD,
It would be hard to get an estimate lower than mine. I am pretty sure my estimate is within a plus or minus range of 1% to reality, but then, my estimate is that it is fewer than 1%. When I taught OW classes, I always asked students why they wanted to learn to dive and what their future plans were. Almost all were focused on a specific upcoming vacation trip, and I cannot even remember hearing new students talk about any significant plans beyond the most basic.
This debate says more about the peculiarities of ScubaBoard than the reality of the outside world. The rest of the diving world pretty much doesn't care.
I decided to leave UTD (about 6 years ago) just prior to heading to Florida for a month, and I decided to take advantage of that opportunity to cross over to TDI while I was there. We had an outstanding month of weather, and so I got in a whole lot of technical diving on a number of dive boats while I was making that crossover. I cannot estimate how many conversations I struck up with dive shop employees and other technical divers on the boats. In that entire time, not a single person I met had ever heard of UTD. Not one. I tried to explain by comparing it to GUE, but I only met one person who knew what GUE was. My TDI instructor had heard of GUE and DIR, but he knew very little about either. When I saw the veiled attacks on DIR and George Irvine in the TDI course materials, I had to explain them my instructor. For example, showing him Irvine's baker's dozen reasons for not using 80% for decompression explained the cryptic attack on "chest thumping" divers insisting on 100% for deco.
A couple years ago, I made a presentation on the concept of bringing technical diving skills into the world of recreational diving to an audience of recreational divers at a dive shop social gathering. When I talked about the history of all of this, I discovered that the audience did not have a clue. Not a single person in there had ever heard of any of this. Not a single person had any idea how the skills used in technical diving were any different from any other skills in diving. Most of all, only a couple showed any interest in making any changes to the way they were diving then. They were just fine the way they were, thank you very much.
I agree. My point was that those beliefs are not the beliefs of the general diving public, and in my experience, they are not the beliefs of the average instructor.I think, collectively (many of us on SB), we have shown that what were once considered "tech" skills are actually "diving" skills. The issue was that most rec instructors didn't have the skills, knowledge or even awareness of what is now (almost) considered best practice. I'm very thankful for having the skills required by those agencies to make me a better instructor no matter which agency's program I'm teaching.
I don't think you have to overwhelm anyone with info just because they asked that initial question. If they don't have any more vision than "continue diving and have fun", you could simply say that taking Fundies might open a door for them for the future that Essentials would not and if they don't have any idea of their future, taking Fundies would give them the most future flexibility. Again, without getting into all the nitty gritty.
You speak as if there were no Cave programs in UTD. Sure, RD may not be your cup of tea and I appreciate that, but have you compared both Cave programs to turn people away from Essentials if they are aspiring to cave dive?
No, I speak as if I would not consider any advanced classes from UTD (for the reasons I posted earlier in this thread). Thus, I would not recommend them to anyone else.
Yes I did read your comments but the reasons you quoted was more in reference with RD and/or tech. So why would you not recommend UTD's cave programs?
I'm not familiar with UTD, but that is not the case for GUE: Explore GUE Courses | Global Underwater ExplorersBecause to get to full cave, one would have to start doing deco diving. Or such is my understanding.