I think that what some folks are failing to see is that any rig you choose involves trade-offs ... and the one that's "best" for any given individual is the one that works best for "them" given the type of diving that they're doing.
For me that happens to be a Hog rig ... for someone else doing the same diving, given their training, background, and preferences, it may be something else.
FWIW - I had a recent opportunity to bring an almost OOA, semi-competent diver up from a 97' depth while sharing air. At no point did the use of the long hose restrict me from staying close to this individual ... that's what the situation called for because he was in no way competent to be attempting an open-water ascent on his own. Frankly, he didn't belong on this dive but that's another story.
The point is that if this had been a different individual ... one who was competent to control his own buoyancy on a free ascent from depth ... I would've also had the option to release his BCD strap and give him the freedom of motion to control his own ascent. I've had occasion to do that as well, and it's quite a bit more comfortable and less complicated than the "traditional" OOA ascent that we're all taught in BOW class.
I haven't experienced the entanglement hazards, panicked diver head-kick, or any of the other horrible scenarios I've read about in this thread. Frankly, if I had I wouldn't consider that I had followed my own training in terms of controlling the situation. That has nothing to do with the choice of rig ... it has to do with how I respond to the situation.
Bottom line is that the longer regulator hose gives me more options. How I use those options is really up to me. With a shorter rig, I wouldn't have as many choices to adapt to the situation.
So, for me, that's reason enough for the gear choices I've made. If yours are different that's OK ... I'll respect your reasons for making them. But please, try to show a little respect for mine as well ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)