You're right, there is a lot of generalizing in the article. But, I don't think that discounts the point they are trying to make.
If I had to guess, yes, just a guess, I'd say that recreational divers as a whole match the general population as a whole. I might be wrong though, but I'd bet a beer I'm not too far off. [/QUQOTE]
That wouldn't be my guess but I don't have any numbers either. You're on for a beer.
You are generalizing here as well. Far lower risk of what? Death from DCS due to poor skills, or death from a heart attack due to poor health?
Maybe I'm generalizing but as I already mentioned DAN reports that buoyancy control problems are reported in 4X% of the dives that result in fatality. When they reported the statistic, buoyancy control problems were reported in 6X% of the dives that resulted in injury.
Now, we can't end up with more than 100% here. Eventually you get to the question...which has the greater correlation to diving accidents, buoyancy control or obesity?
There, IMO, is just no sense in worrying about obesity, which the industry has little or no control over before worrying about buoyancy control which it has quit a bit of ontrol over.
The agency sells certifications and the magazines sell subscriptions and advertising. They are both full of it. You'd be better off reading the National Inquirer.