Wiggsy
Contributor
Seems very fashionable over the last decade for suits to be marketed with either Stainless, Titanium or even "Gold" metallic lining. Many suits now have titanium lining on either internal or external neoprene surfaces (or both). This is supposed to retain more heat through reducing radiative heat loss. I read a good article in Undercurrent archives (like from 2001) that questions the science behind this (actually blows it out of the water), and I'm just wondering how valid the concept is!
Firstly, how much of our heat is lost through 'radiation' when underwater? I would have thought conduction is the problem a wetsuit faces, not 'radiation'. The article explains that the gap between skin and neoprene is too small to allow radiative heat loss. This seems pretty logical to me. I accept that suits with a metallic lining rather than interior nylon against the skin would feel warmer as there is more direct skin/neoprene contact and, maybe, better sealing. But how much difference? In the early days of 'metallic' suits, marketing claimed an extra "2 mm" of warmth.
I'd just be interested in people's impressions of metallic suits - better, much better, or no better? What do you think?
Firstly, how much of our heat is lost through 'radiation' when underwater? I would have thought conduction is the problem a wetsuit faces, not 'radiation'. The article explains that the gap between skin and neoprene is too small to allow radiative heat loss. This seems pretty logical to me. I accept that suits with a metallic lining rather than interior nylon against the skin would feel warmer as there is more direct skin/neoprene contact and, maybe, better sealing. But how much difference? In the early days of 'metallic' suits, marketing claimed an extra "2 mm" of warmth.
I'd just be interested in people's impressions of metallic suits - better, much better, or no better? What do you think?