CWK
Contributor
Different people factor in tips in different ways. In my experience, not every LOB asks for 10%. Some leave it entirely to their guests.tip should be factored in when planning just like port fees
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Different people factor in tips in different ways. In my experience, not every LOB asks for 10%. Some leave it entirely to their guests.tip should be factored in when planning just like port fees
if you can afford 8k for a one week liveaboard, you can afford to tip
tip should be factored in when planning just like port fees
if you can afford 8k for a one week liveaboard, you can afford to tip
This is a potential advantage of tipping culture. It puts a measure of direct pay control in the hands of the customer, a powerful incentive to staff to please them and thus helps insure good customer service with minimal policing by management.
The assumption seems to be the market will drive a rough overall income from the job, x. In a no tip culture, pay ‘p’ = x. If tips =t, in a tip culture, p+t = x.
The question is whether the leverage tipping gives the customer is worth the uncertainty and aggravation of deciding how much to tip, and feeling obligated to do so.
Reading about topside server service in Europe (minimal tipping) vs the US, I’ve read US service tends to be more vigorous and overtly friendly, at times ‘in your face.’ I wonder if live-aboard crew customer service is similarly impacted?
But by paying up front, you run the risk of the owner who collects the increased fee not passing it to his/her employees. Paying more directly to the crew changes the dynamic a bit, although at all times, there is some trust that the money goes to where you intend it to go.