FPDocMatt
Contributor
I can see Jim's point, though. We have an OW diver with Nitrox training, and doesn't know one of the most-common "sort of OOA" situations. If I were the OP, I would worry - what else don't I know?
The information imparted by Jim's statements is perfectly valid. It's just that the phrasing or the wording makes it sounds insulting. What's more important to communicate: "Your class was bad", or "You don't know anything." I submit that "Your class was bad" is perfectly valid. "You don't know anything" is insulting, even if true.
It's difficult to find a truly tactful way of telling someone what Jim wanted to say without sounding insulting. The reason is that the quality of the OP's education is not the real reason for the thread. The reason for the thread is to give him information.
The problem (as nicely expressed by manni-yunk) is that, on Scuba Board, if your training was inadequate and you want information, you are pretty much going to have to have the inadequacy of your training pointed out. And that's not an easy thing to hear.
So I would submit that the inadequacy of a newby's training is not pertinent to a newby's question. It's important, but it's not an important thing to lay in the newby's lap. After all, he's already completed the course. You're just telling him he doesn't know anything, which is insulting.
If you want to make the point that his training sucked, though, there are certainly more tactful ways to put it. How about: "The fact that you ask this question tells me that the nitrox class you took did not impart to you the information that it should have. When you take future scuba courses, I highly recommend that you seek out a different instructor." You see, this is no longer insulting, because it doesn't sound like you're accusing the newby of being a dumb-ass.