dumpsterDiver
Banned
- Messages
- 9,003
- Reaction score
- 4,656
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
Wow, what did I do? I am a "retired" instructor, and have not taught in many years... There is no category for retired instructor. If you think my avatar designation is inapprorpriate, then I am open to suggestions. Would "incompetant solo diver" suffice?
Personally I have VERY little respect for the classification of PADI instructor, and I hope other people are not overly influenced by that certification level either.
As for my competence, I am the absolute BEST internet diver I know!
I can accept that my failure to use a pony all the time is inconsistent. If people want to solo dive with a pony bottle in a pool that is fine with me. I never received ANY technical or solo training, but the suggestion that a redundant air supply is REQUIRED for all solo dives is overkill; but it is really not a big deal. I thought the orginal post was excellent and that was the only point in which I was not in complete agreement.
I have made many, many mistakes diving and I have even reported some of them in various posts made on this board. I very nearly killed myself on a solo, salvage dive to 185 feet in strong current not too long ago. So I certainly have provided sufficient cause to make people wonder.
If you feel that my attitude toward redundancy (in shallow water) makes me incompetent then I guess I can understand that. As for myself, I try to judge personalities on this board by what they say, rather than what certification they claim to have.
I often freedive to 60 feet or so, chase a fish around and then shoot it and try to get to the surface before I die. My only redundancy, is a hopefully attentive buddy. Maybe that will help put my personal opinion in perspective.
I feel very confident that a solo diver should be comfortable ascending from around 40 feet with zero air in their tank. If not, then they should have a pony (and probably should not be diving solo, in my opinion).
Is my comment about no redundancy so offensive because the solo dive training manual says otherwise? Is it simply that? I probably should read one of those solo dive texts.
Personally I have VERY little respect for the classification of PADI instructor, and I hope other people are not overly influenced by that certification level either.
As for my competence, I am the absolute BEST internet diver I know!
I can accept that my failure to use a pony all the time is inconsistent. If people want to solo dive with a pony bottle in a pool that is fine with me. I never received ANY technical or solo training, but the suggestion that a redundant air supply is REQUIRED for all solo dives is overkill; but it is really not a big deal. I thought the orginal post was excellent and that was the only point in which I was not in complete agreement.
I have made many, many mistakes diving and I have even reported some of them in various posts made on this board. I very nearly killed myself on a solo, salvage dive to 185 feet in strong current not too long ago. So I certainly have provided sufficient cause to make people wonder.
If you feel that my attitude toward redundancy (in shallow water) makes me incompetent then I guess I can understand that. As for myself, I try to judge personalities on this board by what they say, rather than what certification they claim to have.
I often freedive to 60 feet or so, chase a fish around and then shoot it and try to get to the surface before I die. My only redundancy, is a hopefully attentive buddy. Maybe that will help put my personal opinion in perspective.
I feel very confident that a solo diver should be comfortable ascending from around 40 feet with zero air in their tank. If not, then they should have a pony (and probably should not be diving solo, in my opinion).
Is my comment about no redundancy so offensive because the solo dive training manual says otherwise? Is it simply that? I probably should read one of those solo dive texts.