Fabasard hit the nail on the head - it's the CO, not the CO2.
With fewer free binding sites on your RBCs for oxygen exchange, your blood's less efficient getting the O2 where it needs to go. Lots of intangibles and anecdotal discussion bouncing around in here alongside the actual SAC rates people are reporting. But here's a fact we can all agree on - breathing enough CO at depth can be (and has been) fatal. Breathing the amount of CO produced in a single cigarette at 1 ATA clearly is not fatal, but it doesn't help.
The more CO you ingest and the deeper you dive thereafter compounds the problem. Beyond that, people are going to do what they do. The human animal is remarkably resilient and adaptive.
Love the discussion about smokeless and buddy breathing - next we'll have 'rings' in the BC pockets!
With fewer free binding sites on your RBCs for oxygen exchange, your blood's less efficient getting the O2 where it needs to go. Lots of intangibles and anecdotal discussion bouncing around in here alongside the actual SAC rates people are reporting. But here's a fact we can all agree on - breathing enough CO at depth can be (and has been) fatal. Breathing the amount of CO produced in a single cigarette at 1 ATA clearly is not fatal, but it doesn't help.
The more CO you ingest and the deeper you dive thereafter compounds the problem. Beyond that, people are going to do what they do. The human animal is remarkably resilient and adaptive.
Love the discussion about smokeless and buddy breathing - next we'll have 'rings' in the BC pockets!