I used to have a 69 Mustang that couldn't possibly pass a safety inspection in NJ. But, I still had a safety inspection sticker
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Maybe we are wrong to think the CE is not applicable to leaky valve. On the Triton, the valve, unlike the KISS valve or similar, is not fed by a single hose.Well, do we really know that? It's no joke above that cmf/leaky valves and orifices can't get CE. So, what pockets did Triton grease to get it?
What was stated above about CE cred might be true.
Funny, I only have an old Beetle (yes you have a Mustang and I have a little Beetle ) and it goes through the MOT without me having to grease anybody hand...I used to have a 69 Mustang that couldn't possibly pass a safety inspection in NJ. But, I still had a safety inspection sticker
Funny, I only have an old Beetle (yes you have a Mustang and I have a little Beetle ) and it goes through the MOT without me having to grease anybody hand...
Maybe you should talk to the certification agency RINA. Excellence Behind Excellence.I spoke to someone who does CE testing today. Mccr have never passed CE. Even they didn't know how the Triton passed.
Yes there is, published on the manufacturers website for 100M with a 10/90 dil 1.75 J/L with 797 spec sofnolime.You won't find any WoB data for the Triton either.
Bottom line, Triton passed EN 14143, it has CE, the burden of proof is firmly now on you to back up your conspiracy theories.I'd like to see it from the CE standard, not Triton's webpage. Bon jour
Hmm. That's a drag. Is there no public documentation on the Triton's cert that shows how that requirement was "satisfied"?