The New Atomic TFX

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

That's a fair question. I'll stiffen up the TFX on the last day and check.
Cool thanks. If it's like other mechanical devices, there's probably a sweet spot that can be found, between factory settings and custom tuning that strikes the perfect balance between reliability and performance.
 
Day 3, TFX  vs D400 and G250
Three great dives today. More sunshine, moderate current, beautiful reefs. Palancar Caves was especially nice, with lots of glorious swimthru's. Yucab is showing stress, with the last three inches of every branching hard coral bleached white.

Today I compared the TFX with my old favorites. The D400 (tuned to 0.6") breathed like a dream. There was a slightly higher pitch to the inhalation sound, but no effort even while holding place in current. But breathing harder, I could sense the added exhalation resistance of the D400. It was of no concern, but I might have had a little concern if I were swimming for my life. Bubble dispersion was occasionally irritating compared with the TFX, but I'm so used to it with this reg that I wasn't as upset as I might have been. The D400 still represents the lightest breathing reg in existence after the TFX. I'll dive one until my rich grandmother buys me as many TFX's as I could ever use. Oh, yeah. I don't have a rich grandmother. Well, as soon as TFX diaphragms are available, @James79 can make us a retainer to use them in our D's.

I *think* what you have reported here is that the TFX is the lightest breathing reg you have tried, yes?

I am unclear on what your expectation is for a D400 with a TFX diaphragm. Do you think that combo will be an overall nicer reg than either of the two alone? Or is this just your nostalgia prompting you to stick with the D400, but improve it?

And how many TFX's could you use? It seems like one, or maybe two at most if you really want one as your octo, would be all you would ever need. :)

The G250 (tuned to 1.0") was like putting on an old shoe. Comfortable and easy breathing. Sharp inhalation wasn't as smooth as with the TFX, because I have an old original Graphite with a Venturi vane that's set in the shop and not easily diver adjustable. Since I keep it slightly detuned to reduce freeflows, simulated heavy breathing wasn't quite as smooth as the TFX. I would still take my old G250 to any depth, but I suspect the TFX might beat its performance at max gas density (132' on EAN28).

One small disappointment... the current had us holding position in one direction, while what we wanted to watch was occasionally behind us. As a result, we were repeatedly looking not only straight down, but more towards our feet. In this position, the TFX exhaust valve was slightly past vertical, and the mouthpiece pretty low. I'd repeatedly get a couple of moist drops on inhalation. It looks like this position is the one Achilles heel for this reg.

As a pleasant discovery however, when I mounted the TFX for diving as my octo, and put the mouthpiece holder in the PADI golden triangle so that the diaphragm was facing the water, I still didn't get a freeflow on giant stride. I had placed the Venturi lever on Minimum, but that's the only adjustment I made. So being tuned hot without an adjustment knob is not a problem when using the TFX as an octo. Worn as a necklace, the reg doesn't hang with the diaphragm facing the water, so it never freeflowed there either.

Another irritation: my new TFX first stage is now very quietly screeching/whining/singing with every few breaths. Just like the Scubapro Mk25, I suspect that the thin spring that's holding the o-ring stack in place is vibrating with high pressure gas flow. I'll take it apart and see if bowing that spring helps.

Do you think that one position that was moist was a function of the design or do you think it would be different with a slightly less aggressive tuning? This is not a rhetorical question. If I'm imagining the orientation correctly, I do that on every dive just to get a rear view.

I reported previously that my TFX breathes a bit wet when in a standing-on-my-head orientation. Mine is tuned exactly as it came out of the box. No "hot" tune (yet).
 
Another irritation: my new TFX first stage is now very quietly screeching/whining/singing with every few breaths.
Is this noise specific to the TFX 1st stage. Does it happen with the T3 1st stage?
 
I *think* what you have reported here is that the TFX is the lightest breathing reg you have tried, yes?

I am unclear on what your expectation is for a D400 with a TFX diaphragm. Do you think that combo will be an overall nicer reg than either of the two alone? Or is this just your nostalgia prompting you to stick with the D400, but improve it?

And how many TFX's could you use? It seems like one, or maybe two at most if you really want one as your octo, would be all you would ever need. :)





I reported previously that my TFX breathes a bit wet when in a standing-on-my-head orientation. Mine is tuned exactly as it came out of the box. No "hot" tune (yet).
I think he expects the larger TFX exhaust diaphragm to lower the D400 exhalation effort which was it main weakness.
 
I think he expects the larger TFX exhaust diaphragm to lower the D400 exhalation effort which was it main weakness.
And there are no D400 diaphragms available.
 
Right. But, is the expectation that that will make it breathe as well (or better?) than the TFX? Or just get it closer?
 
It would be cool if they offered a non TI version at half the price :)

I think all their 2nd stages except the Z2/3 and the M1 are "titanium". I wouldn't expect them to ever have a "non-titanium" TFX. But, I could see them having a version that is the same 2nd stage paired with a non-Ti 1st stage. Maybe a BFX (brass, same as the B2), an SSFX (stainless steel), and then still the TFX?j

The B2 is $900.
The T3 is $2100.

The TFX is $2650.

So, a BFX might be $1450?
 
@rsingler : Did you get an impression on ease of breathing TFX vs d400 in outrageously out of trim orientations? Wet breathing TFX vs d400? Thanks.
I was in Cozumel a couple of weeks ago and was happily surprised at both the corals and fish life vs Roatan. Lots of Barracudas!
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom