Well, I'm kind of seeing a dichotomy of answers.
One group would like the forum to adhere strictly to the original rules . . . DIR answers only; basic questions answered briefly and threads closed, and space for people to post more advanced questions and hope for educated answers.
Another group believes that the forum should be moderated as little as possible, and if someone posts a question and non-DIR answers are offered, the DIR users will make it clear that those answers are not appropriate.
Unfortunately, the noise that results from that approach, as well as the nastiness and ill-will, are things I see as having detrimental effects on the original purpose of the forum, which was to be a place where people could ask those, "Do I have to have a long hose to take Fundies?" questions and get them answered without being attacked for having asked them.
Thanks, everybody, for the input here. I think I have my marching orders as I see them, and everybody has helped clarify my ideas of what I should be doing moderating this forum.
One group would like the forum to adhere strictly to the original rules . . . DIR answers only; basic questions answered briefly and threads closed, and space for people to post more advanced questions and hope for educated answers.
Another group believes that the forum should be moderated as little as possible, and if someone posts a question and non-DIR answers are offered, the DIR users will make it clear that those answers are not appropriate.
Unfortunately, the noise that results from that approach, as well as the nastiness and ill-will, are things I see as having detrimental effects on the original purpose of the forum, which was to be a place where people could ask those, "Do I have to have a long hose to take Fundies?" questions and get them answered without being attacked for having asked them.
Thanks, everybody, for the input here. I think I have my marching orders as I see them, and everybody has helped clarify my ideas of what I should be doing moderating this forum.