A few years ago I went through the typical middle-aged problem where either my eyesight deteriorated (or my arms got shorter ) so I went for a Suunto Eon Steel so I could actually see what was on the screen. However as I got more into Tec I realised it was more of a rec computer with some Tec capabilities. No such issues with the Perdix! Also nice to be able to plan a dive on Multi-deco and the Perdix with the same results.
Fair opinion, although I would disagree. I much prefer my Eon over my Perdix, I think think the screen displays, and menu structure is light years ahead of the Perdix.
I have no issues planning Tec on the Suunto nor the Perdix, and Suunto Fused RGBM gives similar real world times to that of the Perdix.
I like the bomb proof construction of the Steel and agree with posters above about the Perdix battery cover - I'd personally prefer a knurled thumb screw made of metal for the battery cover.
The Perdix is nice and light - the Eon is really heavy on the wrist when just wearing just a rash vest
When Suunto release Buhlmann on the Eon steel later this year then my Perdix will be passed on unless I dedicate it to my SM rig as it can display 2 gas pressures at the same time unlike the Eon
I don't like the bluetooth nonsense on the Perdix either - I gave up trying to get it to download to my main PC (yes I can down to the cloud and to the app)
But in the end Perdix is a good computer, just not my preferred choice