Don,
There must be some misconception of the CF size rating of tanks here.. 80CF is 80CF is 80CF. Whether stored in a 2000 psi or 3000 psi or 4000 psi vessel is irrelevant. The interior volume of the three containers would be .6 CF, .4 CF and .3 CF respectively, making the usable gas from each 79.4CF, 79.6CF and 79.7CF respectively if they were each filled to 80 CF in the first place. And while a difference of .3CF *is* indeed "measurable," it is not significant. Certainly not significant enough to make it "the main reason" to support HP over LP.
Perhaps your friend is talking about the useable gas when the Scuba Nazis demand a 500psi reserve... in that case, your "useable" gas in the three tanks above becomes 60CF, 66.7CF, and 70CF respectively, and that is indeed significant... and explaining to those who demand 500psi remain regardless of tank type that the 2000 psi 80 has twice the gas (20CF)as the 4000 psi 80 (10CF) at 500 psi is probably a waste of time.
Then again, maybe he's referring the fact that the standard AL 80 holds 77.4 CF at 3000 while a HP 80 holds 80 at its rated pressure.
Rick