Sub sinks

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Even snorkeling is not safe there.

We had no safety issues diving in Marsa Shagra for 2 weeks last Oct/Nov. To my taste, the crew was even too much concerned with safety.
 
From that article: “Speaking to Russian media, a survivor said that as they took their reserved seats, water started "pouring in" as two hatches were open. She said it was as if the submarine had fallen off "whatever it was holding on to".

(Earlier, we learned that tourists are taken out to the submarine - which is docked at a floating platform - on a regular boat).

But other unconfirmed reports said the vessel hit a reef at 20 metres and lost pressure.”

Wait, so for the people that survived, how were they rescued? At depth? Were people hospitalized because they swam to the surface holding their breath?
 
Should also have been capable of surfacing after sinking.

Beginning to wonder if the RS is cursed with some sort of energy vortex ... Wonder which Pharaoh is disturbed ...
Once diving at Big Brother we could clearly hear what sounded like a diesel engine underwater. Ours was the only boat in the area and it was moored ... Some claim there is a "ghost German sub" from WWII still patrolling the area ...:cool:
 
would never have got in one of those things!
I did hundreds and hundreds of dives as deep as 100 meters in the Voyager subs. We never had a single incident. The ABS & USCG crawled up our collective asses on a routine basis ensuring safety. The sodasorb bill was sky high.
 
From that article: “Speaking to Russian media, a survivor said that as they took their reserved seats, water started "pouring in" as two hatches were open. She said it was as if the submarine had fallen off "whatever it was holding on to".

(Earlier, we learned that tourists are taken out to the submarine - which is docked at a floating platform - on a regular boat).

But other unconfirmed reports said the vessel hit a reef at 20 metres and lost pressure.”

Wait, so for the people that survived, how were they rescued? At depth? Were people hospitalized because they swam to the surface holding their breath?
As with the liveaboard disasters recently, the only way to get an idea of what actually happened will be to piece together a coherent account from the stories of survivors. We'll get nothing from the authorities.
 
I did hundreds and hundreds of dives as deep as 100 meters in the Voyager subs. We never had a single incident. The ABS & USCG crawled up our collective asses on a routine basis ensuring safety. The sodasorb bill was sky high.

It's not the vessel per se, but the regulatory environment. A tourist sub in Hurghada? Seriously, they can't keep a boat afloat or not on fire. Cyprus was no better in the old days.
 
I did hundreds and hundreds of dives as deep as 100 meters in the Voyager subs. We never had a single incident. The ABS & USCG crawled up our collective asses on a routine basis ensuring safety. The sodasorb bill was sky high.
And therein lies the difference. I would bet that you all had more inspections in a quarter than those in Egypt had in a year.

Gotta love lay person comments from this BBC article
Dr James Aldridge from Bristol took the same trip on the submarine in February 2025. He told the BBC: "The sub was well-maintained and was as shown in the promotional photos.

"Fresh paint, modern equipment and with attentive and professional English-speaking staff (including two divers to accompany you down)."
The good doctor should probably stick to medicine. A house with fresh paint over rotting timbers an a ring door bell would also fit into his description.
 
You look concerned or bored
Probably concerned. At that point I was probably calculating hard ballast, and it was always a SWAG.
 
Back
Top Bottom