Or another take on LP vs HP from the spec chart. PSI-CF--Dia.--length---weight--empty--full
1. Faber/OMS LP 85 (one of my favorites)
OMS 85-- 2400 +10% --85-- 7-- 26-- 31-- 0 -- -6.7
2. Faber 80 HP
Faber 80-- 3180 +10%-- 80 --7.25-- 19.88-- 32.5-- -7.22-- -13.22
3. PST 80 HP
PST 80-- 3500-- 82-- 7.25-- 19.75-- 28.6-- -3.3-- -9.3
4. PST 100 HP
PST 100-- 3500-- 102-- 7.25-- 23.94-- 34.1-- -1.3-- -8.8
If you look with an open mind you will see that the steel LP Faber (OMS in the chart--mine are a Faber but is dimensional like the OMS) 85 is hardly larger at all, actually lighter or competive in and out of water weight, not excessively negative (better for warm water diving) and when filled to 3,000 (usually not a big problem) holds as much or more air than the 80 and 100 HP cylinders. It is not always so clear cut. Some LP tanks like the Faber/OMS 85 are awfully nice to dive and make a great double set as well. BTW, the Faber/OMS LP 85 is I recall about 97 cf at 3,000 psi, which is nothing for this super tough tank.
N
1. Faber/OMS LP 85 (one of my favorites)
OMS 85-- 2400 +10% --85-- 7-- 26-- 31-- 0 -- -6.7
2. Faber 80 HP
Faber 80-- 3180 +10%-- 80 --7.25-- 19.88-- 32.5-- -7.22-- -13.22
3. PST 80 HP
PST 80-- 3500-- 82-- 7.25-- 19.75-- 28.6-- -3.3-- -9.3
4. PST 100 HP
PST 100-- 3500-- 102-- 7.25-- 23.94-- 34.1-- -1.3-- -8.8
If you look with an open mind you will see that the steel LP Faber (OMS in the chart--mine are a Faber but is dimensional like the OMS) 85 is hardly larger at all, actually lighter or competive in and out of water weight, not excessively negative (better for warm water diving) and when filled to 3,000 (usually not a big problem) holds as much or more air than the 80 and 100 HP cylinders. It is not always so clear cut. Some LP tanks like the Faber/OMS 85 are awfully nice to dive and make a great double set as well. BTW, the Faber/OMS LP 85 is I recall about 97 cf at 3,000 psi, which is nothing for this super tough tank.
N