- Messages
- 808
- Reaction score
- 40
- # of dives
- 200 - 499
FWIW. . .
My brother is a professor of engineering at Duke who studies fluid dynamics. He is also an avid diver. I posed the question to him a couple of years ago regarding any possible advantage to splits. From a hydrodynamic standpoint, he explained that they are not as efficient as paddles.
Later when I became involved in another thread on this topic I querried him again. His response was that, "They place the shed vortices in the water in a orientation that serve no useful thrust purposes." He sent me copies of three studies. The files were very large (and incomprehensible to me) and I subsequently deleted them. However, he also said that paddles were not much better and that all fins are not very efficient in general (at least the ones used by humans).
So I can't supply references but it was good enough for me. My take is you should use whatever feels right for you and the kind of diving that you do. Me, I love my Jets.
My brother is a professor of engineering at Duke who studies fluid dynamics. He is also an avid diver. I posed the question to him a couple of years ago regarding any possible advantage to splits. From a hydrodynamic standpoint, he explained that they are not as efficient as paddles.
Later when I became involved in another thread on this topic I querried him again. His response was that, "They place the shed vortices in the water in a orientation that serve no useful thrust purposes." He sent me copies of three studies. The files were very large (and incomprehensible to me) and I subsequently deleted them. However, he also said that paddles were not much better and that all fins are not very efficient in general (at least the ones used by humans).
So I can't supply references but it was good enough for me. My take is you should use whatever feels right for you and the kind of diving that you do. Me, I love my Jets.
Last edited:

