I dont claim comprehensive knowledge of all what if situations...but I do try to learn as much as I can about as many as I can. I try to read and study the stuff that has happened to you all, and research consistantly about others one's that I haven't seen mentioned.
Research is one thing. Experience is another.
I could read a book about
X subject and understand the risks.... but that would, in no way, equip me to deal with those risks.... or educate me how I would be capable of psychologically coping under those circumstances.
The internet is a wonderful thing - a vast resource, but not a substitute in any way for actually doing something. The only thing you learn about yourself from internet searching - is how good you are at finding and digesting info on the internet.
As far as knowing my gear...I would say I know my gear pretty well...
I'd say that you probably aren't equipped (no pun intended) to make that statement.
Ingrained familiarity - from the perspective of emergency management - is dictated by the unconscious ability to operate the equipment automatically and without task loading, whilst dealing with multiple stressors and demands. To be assured of that level of competence, you need to have tested your ingrained function under those circumstances.
As an example, I switched to sidemount configuration some time ago. I did a very good course to use the equipment - that was merely a starting point. Since that time, I've dove (almost exclusively) in sidemount.... some 250+ dives (rec and tec). I am STILL developing
what I consider to be reliable and ingrained familiarity with that equipment.
The key issue is
what you consider to be a level of familiarity. Such expectations tend to be in-line with relative experience... meaning that a noobie's expectations are considerably lower than an experienced diver's. That is where I see a disconnect between the advice given, and the response illustrated in your replies. What you consider 'good' or 'competent' differs markedly from what more experienced divers are trying to educate you about.
...someone like me isn't going to have the same gear as you DevonDiver. You would have much much more that I do, as well as far more complicated gear.
Not at all. One thing I've learned is that simplicity and minimalism is a core factor in incident response under stress. Sidemount aside (
I use that for recreational, open-water, shallow diving only for the purposes of developing familiarity/ingrained skill) I'd hazard a guess that my OW kit was far more simplistic and minimal that what you use.
Someone can own a skateboard and know all the in's and out's of each piece of it pretty quickly....but know how to use it is what will take time.
...and that's exactly what I'm talking about when I refer to familiarity and ingrained skill.... the
operation.
Also, I know that the scuba teaching nowadays is cremepuffs to the old school teachings, and I wished that it was more rigorous...but sadly isn't. Which is why I'm here....and other places....to learn as much as I can.
It's just as rigorous..... only nowadays, it is modular/staged training...allowing a progressive development in line with the student's development of skill, experience and confidence (
and also convenience and budget....).
Sign up for a solo diver course...and see if that isn't as 'rigorous' as you'd dream of...
The point being... OW training is just what it says it is..... training to dive (using the buddy system) in an OW environment. That environment having conditions equal to, or better than, what you trained in. Given that most OW lessons are run in very benign conditions - it qualifies you to dive (with a buddy) in benign conditions. It does not qualify you to dive without a buddy... even if conditions are benign.
And lastly, I dont dive deeper than what I can freedive to comfortably. Even if I had 5 catastrophic things happen at once, I can easily ditch my gear and ascend.
If entangled?
If physically incapacitated?
Again... there's a
hypothetical assumption made (that you can "easily ditch gear and ascend"). Until you've proven that capability - under stress, with real 'catastrophic events occurring', then it's just a pipe-dream...a fantasy.
Its true that experience (and knowledge) are the only things that count...but do they always have to be your own?
If we're talking about the practical application of skill, under sub-optimum conditions, by an individual.... then, YES... what matters is your
own experience, capability and psychology.
Its true that until Im in a situation I wont totally know how I'm going to respond as far as staying cool and collected, but as for knowing what to do in that situation and how to respond, that I can learn from others who have experienced it.
Knowing what to do.... and doing it.... are two very different realities. If they weren't, then far fewer people would die on scuba.
I am a newb, and I hope that as I am rebuked or challenged that I can humbly assess myself and learn from those of you who do have so much experience.
If you want to short-cut the long path to experience and self-awareness as a diver, then the best route is to seek a credible mentor/instructor... not necessarily to
teach you, but more importantly to
test you.
I don't have a firm opinion on the minimum experience (logged dives) needed to go solo.... because experience varies... but 100 dives does seem like a fair minimum to me, when considering solo diving. What I do strongly believe is that, without a huge breadth of experience, the potential solo/tech/overhead diver does need to be accurately self-aware of their capabilities, and that can come from performance feedback from someone who does possess that experience. The easiest (for most) method to obtain that feedback is through training of an increasingly progressive and demanding nature.