Yes, I can see my arms at greater than 180 degrees, and I'm definitely a man. I was going to ask you for a citation for that quote above, but it appears that the quote was not from a technical publication. I think that perhaps men focus on things ahead, but I don't think there is much difference in peripheral vision between the sexes.Guys I am curious if this gender peripheral vision thing is real. Try this: stand up and stare straight ahead at a fixed point, spread arms wide 180 degrees, wiggle fingers. Can you see them? How much do you have to angle in to see them both at the same time? It’s just like your buddy kicking next to you. If you can then wouldn’t you want to see that? Yeah, no more black mask skirts for me!
As you probably know, there are two types of cells in our eyes, rods and cones. The cone cells react to bright light, and are color receptors. The rod cells are used at night for our night vision, and we see differently at night verses in daylight. There is also a "blind spot" for the rod cells right in the center of our visual field (where the optic nerve exits the eye), so at night you need to move the eyes side-to-side to see some areas toward the center of the visual field.
Difference between Rods and Cones - MD
We have gotten used to a lack of peripheral vision in diving, starting with the oval mask. I enjoy three-window masks for this reason, that they give me back my peripheral vision. We have also not been taught anymore how to observe and use our vision, how to scan to see things, how to look through foliage to see beyond things (it has to do with focus), or how to take in the entire visual field. We assume everyone knows that, but not everyone does. Underwater, where things are dimmer most times, moving our visual reference by looking side-to-side helps to see what's there; but this is a terrible habit if you are using a helmet-mounted video camera, as it will make the audience sick.
Here is a study of sex differences in color vision, which seems to show that except in one wavelength (green-yellow region), there was little difference:
SeaRatJ Vis. 2012 Jan 24;12(1). pii: 18. doi: 10.1167/12.1.18.
Sex-related differences in peripheral human color vision: a color matching study.
Murray IJ1, Parry NR, McKeefry DJ, Panorgias A.
Author information
Abstract
There has been much controversy as to whether there are sex-related differences in human color vision. While previous work has concentrated on testing the central visual field, this study compares male versus female color vision in the near peripheral retina. Male (n = 19) and female (n = 19) color normal observers who exhibited no significant differences either in the midpoints or the ranges of their Rayleigh matches were tested with a color matching paradigm. They adjusted hue and saturation of a 3° test spot (18° eccentricity) until it matched a 1° probe (1° eccentricity). Both groups demonstrated measurable shifts in the appearance of the peripheral color stimuli similar to those that have been previously reported. However, females showed substantially less saturation loss than males (p < 0.003) in the green-yellow region of color space. No significant differences were found in other regions of color space. This difference in the perceived saturation of color stimuli was minimally affected either by the inclusion or exclusion in the analysis of potential heterozygous female carriers of deutan color vision deficiencies. We speculate that this advantage of female over male color vision is conferred by M-cone polymorphism.
PMID:
22275467
DOI:
10.1167/12.1.18
Sex-related differences in peripheral human color vision: a color matching study. - PubMed - NCBI