SlugLife
Contributor
TLDR: Would you recommend I go HP 117, 133, or 149 for Sidemount?
I've been diving Sidemount for a year, and figured it might be time to get some steel-tanks. The used market has been non-existent locally. So I'm considering new tanks.
The reason I'm leaning towards bigger tanks is:
* AL80 36.9 full (for reference)
* Steel 100: 42.12 full. (+5.2 lbs, +20cu, 100s vs 80al)
* Steel 117: 48.18 full. (+5.2 lbs, +17cu, 117s vs 100s)
* Steel 120 (similar to 117, but smaller diameter and more $$)
* Steel 133: 53.23 full. (+5 lbs, +16cu. 133s vs 117s) <-- leaning here
* Steel 149: 58.66 full. (+5.43 lbs, +16cu. 133s vs 149s)
Right now I'm leaning towards 133s. Thoughts?
I've been diving Sidemount for a year, and figured it might be time to get some steel-tanks. The used market has been non-existent locally. So I'm considering new tanks.
The reason I'm leaning towards bigger tanks is:
- Fewer refills, longer dives, or 2-dives per tank. (1-hr drive to fill-station)
- Future-proofing. Good for tech/cave/etc diving which I'm not doing quite yet, but likely to get into.
- I find carrying tanks in general more annoying due to bulk, not weight. I'm not a big guy, but I don't mind the exercise, and it's all in the legs.
- The difference in price isn't that significant. (Although, the HP120s are a little more expensive per volume)
* AL80 36.9 full (for reference)
* Steel 100: 42.12 full. (+5.2 lbs, +20cu, 100s vs 80al)
* Steel 117: 48.18 full. (+5.2 lbs, +17cu, 117s vs 100s)
* Steel 120 (similar to 117, but smaller diameter and more $$)
* Steel 133: 53.23 full. (+5 lbs, +16cu. 133s vs 117s) <-- leaning here
* Steel 149: 58.66 full. (+5.43 lbs, +16cu. 133s vs 149s)
Right now I'm leaning towards 133s. Thoughts?