Shots from Central FL trip on 2-18 thru 2-20

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

SuPrBuGmAn:
E500 is a great camera, best bang for buck as far as budget dSLRs go as well IMO.

I guess one thing to consider when you start getting into the DSLR world is that lenses and the manufacture is where one is making a commintment, not to a given body. So ask if the lenses available meet the needs. One cool thing about Nikkon/Canon is the large amount of used high end glass at a fraction of the cost of new, and most good lenses have a life of 30+ years if one takes care.

Oly dumped it's SLR line once in recent history, they have remained well behind Canon, Nikon, Fuji (Nikon Mount), and even Kodak in DSLR development, and remain behind in all but the low end market (prosumer under 1K).

So the question really becomes how much faith do you have that Oly will continue to support the DSLR line in light of the fact they have abondened their SLR users in the past decade or so, and does that really matter to the individual?

If you buy one body, and one lens this is really not as much of a factor. For those of us who have thousands inversted in glass over decades, having a manufacture that stands behind the mounts, and the glass, and competes or stays current with new technology is very valuable.

Ports are certainly another consideration, and housings for that matter. In five years I'm betting there will be a LOT of D200's still in service. If you invest in a housing there is a good chance that you will be able to find those D200's for a decade, and I'm betting that is not going to be very true of a lot of camera's being made today.
 
RonFrank:
Oly dumped it's SLR line once in recent history, they have remained well behind Canon, Nikon, Fuji (Nikon Mount), and even Kodak in DSLR development, and remain behind in all but the low end market (prosumer under 1K).

So the question really becomes how much faith do you have that Oly will continue to support the DSLR line in light of the fact they have abondened their SLR users in the past decade or so, and does that really matter to the individual?

Sigma is releasing 4/3rd lenses for the Oly dSLRs. They've just announced 5 more lenses with 4/3rd mounts which will be added to the few lenses that they've been carrying for 4/3rds for a couple years.

Panasonic just released a 4/3rds body. It premiered with a Leica midzoom with OIS. I doubt this will be the first/last lense Leica makes for 4/3rd mount cams considering their relationship with Panasonic.

Olympus has (4) bodies for the 4/3rd lenses in just as many years, with a new pro-body that is supposed to be available by early '07.

4/3rds is not an Olympus only venture, it was a joint project with several companies to build a digital SLR system from the ground up. I believe Olympus, Sigma, Panasonic, Fuji, and a few other companies helped develope the system. While we haven't seen anything from Fuji in the world of 4/3rds since their part in developement, it doesn't mean there isn't room for them in the future.

Olympus's own line of lenses with Zuiko glass is actually quite fantastic. There are some gaps that some people would like to see taken care of, but whats available is more than ample and all top-notch. You really don't have to worry about whether or not the lense is a good one or not when purchasing Zuiko, there aren't many, but they're all good(as good or better than Canon/Nikon according to some when paired up to similar lenses). That being said, I don't think lenses will ever be a concern to me as the lenses currently available are plenty enough for my needs and with the surge of new bodies using the same mount, I don't think there will be a shortage anytime soon.

I'm not sure how they are behind in dSLR developement. No, they don't have a camera that shoots rapid frames at an obscene amount of mp, or at super high 'film' speeds, but the image quality is fantastic and color and tonality are top-notch. There is a pro-level camera in the works that should be available by early '07 that may deliver all these things for the pro's who need them and the gadget geeks who just want em. The pro level Zuiko glass obviously wasn't intended for the likes of the E500 and E300 budget cameras. They are were(Panasonic now shares the technology) the only manufacture who have the SSWF filters on the sensor preventing dust. You can remap your pixels without sending the cam off to the manufacturer(I'm willing to bet all those early D200 users wished they had that after banding became a real problem for some). First dSLR specific lenses for their bodies. First with LiveView.

I guess in the end, it would depend on what you want to shoot as well. The currently lineup of Olympus bodies aren't any faster than 3fps and shots taken at ISO1600 will show an unacceptable amount of noise without a thirdparty program used to clean them up. If you want to shoot sports in lowlight, look elsewhere :)
 
The Oly E330, seems to be a refinement and improvement of the E500 in many ways.
Thoughts all?
Not trying to stir the pot too much here :D.

BTW Suprbugman the E500 looks to be a fine camera, kudos on owning it :).
 
Jamdiver:
The Oly E330, seems to be a refinement and improvement of the E500 in many ways.
Thoughts all?
Not trying to stir the pot too much here.

Body quality and looks of the E300(better framing) with poroprism, improved WB and metering that the E500 had, new 7.5mp sensor that has cleaner high ISOs made by Panasonic, and the LiveView.

I think its a winner.
 
Since I'm just now getting to this thread (better late than never) - Nice pictures.

Happy 100 Darcy!!!!!

It would be nice to see OLY do well with the 330. It has a lot of nice features that I could see myself using like the LCD and budget minded housing. I might be tempted to move up, one day, if they ever get that sensor perfected that can capture all wave lengths on each pixel. I saw on a TV program somewhere that somebody is working on that. Until then, the old 5050 has my vote (paid for and can switch from macro to normal shooting during a dive :thumb:).

**I'm not a professional photographer and don't play one on TV. I have not stayed at a Holiday Inn recently either. YMMV**
 
photohikedive:
Hiya yoda, hows things your way?
Busy - Taxes are on the table so I thought I'd stall for a minute and see who's posting pictures :D.
 
not me, I dont have a camera yet. need to fix that. speaking of fixing.

when I woke up this morning, I went to turn on the sink...... nothing.

It got so cold the pipes in the basement froze, one even broke. just got finished fixing it about an hour ago.

I really cant wait to live in FL again!
 
Points well made, and I agree that for a lot of shooters the OLY 4/3 system is certainly a very worthwhile option to persue. And maybe it will stand the test of time, but OLY is the ONLY maker of the 4/3 system. Sigma is making lenses for it.. why? Because it's VERY easy for them to adapt current lenses to this mount. Fuji DSLR's use the Nikon lens mount, and I seriously doubt that will change as it's the oldest 35mm mount still in use today, and accepts AF lenses.

Had I purchase into the Oly system when I started shooting, I'd either sold all that stuff and switched to Nikon or Canon long ago, or I'd have a lot of worthless glass sitting on a shelf. Same holds true for Pentax, Minolta, in fact every manufacture other than Nikon or Canon. In fact since I stated shooting before the AF revolution (imagine that) even Canon would have been an issue as they dropped the F mount in favor of their current mount.

As it stands I have many lenses I'm shooting that are 10-20 years old. That includes some performers like the 80-200f2.8, the 60mm f2.8 macro, and the 50mm f1.4. In addition I've sold a LOT of my lenses like the 20mm f2.8, and 180mm f2.8 and got more for them on ebay then I originally paid. These lenses while old work with my D1x, and will work with the D200. All my current lenses are the AF D mount, so they even work with todays electronics like iTTL.

So if you are someone who is considering professional photography, or thinking that photography will be something that is of interest long term, think very hard about your equipment choice.

If someone would have told me when I was in my mid twenties that I'd be shooting some of the same good glass I purchased then nearly 20 years later, I would have laughed at them, but that is exactly what has happened much to my surprise.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom