shrwdtech
Contributor
rescuediver009:First things first. I have no problem with sherwoods.Used a blizard for a number of years and it was great. I agree with you in that they do not breath harder at depth. I believe that what most people are referring to is the cracking resistance as you pass about a hundred feet depending... Now this can be overcome with an adjustable second stage right? What about the maximus. I would be interested in hearing what sherwoodtech has to say about the maximus. and its adjustability. If you set up the maximus and it breathes like crap (i.e. over 2" of water) there is nothing that you can do about it as there are no second stage adjustments internally. Is this true or did I miss something. I am not finding fault. I assume that in your position you would know about it if it exists... or are there design flaws?
Okay. Looks like I misunderstood then! In that, you are correct. There is no way on all the Sherwood Regs but the Maximus to alter the cracking resistance. Honestly, in all my years of diving, I've never once touched my adjustable 2nd stage underwater once I had it set. I am sure it's just me, but at depth I've never found a reason to make my reg offer air easier.
As for the Maximus, the adjustment is just that. It's not a balancing function, it effects the spring tension and only the spring tension by moving the sealing surface of the orifice away from the LP seat and poppit assembly. Basically it lets air pass with less resistance. Set up properly it should almost free flow on the surface when all the way open and be extremely tight when closed all the way.
As for flaws? I'd not say so. There are none that I'm aware of. And the fact that Sherwood's not altered the basic design over the years I suppose attests to that, as well. As with all manufacturers, the Maximus had a service recall a few years ago due to the design of the adjustable orifice, but that has been pretty much all cleaned up.
Happy New Year 2004 everybody!!!!