Are people being totally honest when they say they swim with feeding sharks to witness the beauty of these animals, which is indeed great but can be seen almost as closely at zoos and aquarium --- as opposed to looking for the bragging rights or thrill-seeking that comes with such activities? I am not critcizing these latter motivations, mind you; in fact, thrill-seeking has a noble tradition. There is nothing wrong with thrill-seeking or adventuring. But such activities have risks.
My point is simply this: if part of the allure of an activity is a certain degree of risk, why do people suddenly go aghast when occasionally something bad DOES happen? When a race car driver dies, a hang glider crashes, a rock climber falls or an Everest explorer freezes to death, why does this amaze us or even disturb us...if such events were totally eliminated, the activities mentioned would cease to have their unique appeal. They would become Disney rides, fun, but hardly adventures.
Condolences to the family, all deaths are a tragedy. But I have seen plenty of people die lingering deaths who would have opted, instead, to die with the sharks at 75 ft and not with, say, sea level prostate cancer.
If we over analyze these events, pretty soon the whole world will be reduced to one big EPCOT experience.