1) Never spent any real time in the actual water with sharks close up
I have, does that mean my opinion is valid?
2) Don't know the record including # of dives, safety procedures, experience with diving operations, etc. of an operator
Nor do you since they aren't collected by an independent organization that evaluates dive op safety. I can tell you that if you see "tiger shark" "cageless" and "chum" in the dive description, that you are taking a risk not unlike hanging out with the bears in yellowstone park. There are more people who encounter bears every year than tiger sharks without getting hurt, but the park rangers still tell you to not feed or approach the bears. The sign doesn't say that the risk of getting attacked is high. The sign is there because if an attack does occur, it is most likely fatal.
Mind you, we have no idea what type of shark was involved in the accident or what sort of dive it was. However, we do know the dive op engages in dives where the chance of an attack being severe or fatal is high even if the chance of it occurring is low.
3) Speculate without any facts
Facts breed speculation. When you hear about a spearfisher getting attacked by a shark, normally you think "I bet he wouldn't let his catch go". Then later your suspicion is confirmed usually because past trends indicate future results. There is a difference between speculation formed on non-existent trends and those just made up by people.
When you hear a submerged diver was attacked by a shark, you normally think a few things:
1. a food source or the smell of food was nearby
2. molestation of the animal
3. pregnant female
These are some safe assumptions to make because if you look at the record these are most often the case.
I personally have chartered JASA (Jim Abernethy's Scuba Adventures) 7+ times with most for Shark Expeditions. He is a lot safer than many if not most of those "kneel here and we'll feed the sharks for you!" type dives. A
Understand why your personal experience is taken and ignored:
Anecdotal evidence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The "cameras taken away" is more a stunt than regular occurance. Never happened to me or any of my fellow photographers in hundreds of dives and hours.
Anecdotal evidence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The State of FLA has it's proverbial head up it's you know what, too. They ban any dive operation from bait yet allow MILLIONS of bathers every year to enter murky splash filled water next to like, 75 fishing piers? Dumping guts and blood into them right next to Johnny and Susy splashing around.......How retarded.
I've been on a shark feed dive before. However, they were attracting sharks that feed on dead/dieing/small fish. I really didn't see the harm in this.
Sorry for the rant, but I'd like to Google how many dog, cat, ferret, snake, or people bites etc. resulted in hospital visits on 2/24/08. Or how many sharks necessary for the complete environmental balance were finned or hooked and killed on the same day. The sharks sure should fear us more than we fear them.
Last year there were 38 million estimated finnings of sharks. There was 1 human fatality by shark. 38 million to 1, yeah we're kicking their butts.
Let's wait for real information.....
Let's not. The fact is, this could have been a case of the divers doing a completely normal dive and a diver getting attacked for no reason at all. However, this is _extremely_ unlikely.
P.S. - I see this has ended sadly. I do, of course, feel sympathy for the man and his family. But again, facts need to be known........
And they will come out. I don't think there is a case of schadenfreude going on. We are _hoping_ that this _won't_ be a case of "see i told you so".