ThatDogDontHunt
Oscar Meyer Weiner
Agreed that some models should be avoided. My recent $0.99 purchase is the glued model. For the price I thought it was worth it just for the S & G and raw entertainment value.We do service the Uwatec Nitrox Pro as well as any other Uwatec dive computer with exception of the Nitrox Air (is totally glued and can not be put together in a reliable way) and Uwatec's last generation, the Smart series with an infrared interface (Pro, Com, Tec, etc). We charge $70, plus return shipping and the service includes waterproofing the unit. Check our website: www.divewatchdoctor.com.
It's true that the procedure can be performed by a person with some technical vocation and very good soldering skills to unsolder the old 3.6V battery and solder back the new, without toasting the electronic components (particularly those close to the "+" terminal. However, the next step, removing the air bubbles while refilling the oil is quite tricky. Finally, you have to restart the computer an get it to read battery 99%. This is the last step and you have to wait until it displays the "Err" reading, which "normally" happens right after installing the fresh battery. Once there and if you know how to apply the correct electrical impulse, the oldest ones (Aladin Pro, Sport Plus, etc.) are relatively easy to restart. The Nitrox Pro, Nitrox Pro2, not so easy because they tend to have an autonomous spirit.
There are several battery replacement services that advertise online. They all appear to be cheaper than factory service and also will service older models that the factory will not?
But once again I would like to trivialize a warning (without giving out too many trade secrets).
If you wanted to seal a Tupperware container full of water with zero air bubbles, most people would fail miserably despite multiple attempts on their kitchen counter - until they got out of the kitchen and filled their tub with water and submerged the empty container and lid separately and then put the lid on under water. No air bubbles. What could be simpler?