Her new tax is a mockery. Taxes won't cover up for her horrible plans, but she promises welfare so Detroit will keep electing her and you can keep saying goodbye to more and more jobs. If the economy's already doing horrible, how does she expect to help it by taxing everybody to death. Doesn't make any sense to me, but does any Liberal philosphy do? Oh well, probalby shouldn't talk about that here, it's supposed to be a diving website...
Scuba Tax?
- Thread starter CMAN
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Actually she doesn't have to care about the voters any more, this is her second and last term. At least for the spot of Govenor, maybe for Senator or something like that.
Lancelot
Contributor
Is she still Canadian or did she get US citizen status?
Whew... glad for you Midwesterners that it is an April Fools.
There was a proposal out here in Caleefornyia to add a "tax" of $1 per fill to fund the sinking of ships for reefs. I was adamantly opposed to such a tax (at the rate I dive, I'd go broke!) because I didn't feel it was appropriate to ask all divers to fund a program to sink ships for wreck divers or create artificial reefs. I said I'd be much more supportive of a tax to help conserve natural reefs... I felt it was more important to properly fund the conservation of our natural habitat and that artificial habitat could wait until we had addressed the problems in our kelp forests. Fortunately there was enough opposition to squelch the idea.
There was a proposal out here in Caleefornyia to add a "tax" of $1 per fill to fund the sinking of ships for reefs. I was adamantly opposed to such a tax (at the rate I dive, I'd go broke!) because I didn't feel it was appropriate to ask all divers to fund a program to sink ships for wreck divers or create artificial reefs. I said I'd be much more supportive of a tax to help conserve natural reefs... I felt it was more important to properly fund the conservation of our natural habitat and that artificial habitat could wait until we had addressed the problems in our kelp forests. Fortunately there was enough opposition to squelch the idea.
gtxl1200
Contributor
drbill:
gtxl1200:
Then why did the OP later post in this thread that it was an April Fools joke? If true, pretty strange. You say you want a revolution... divers of the world unite.
i saw a report earlier, Michigan is already one of the highest taxed states in America along with California, Virginia, New York and a few others, but as you see raising taxes does not solve any problems, it just makes people more reliant on the government. if it is proposed it will pass in Michigan, they have no reason to protect divers, we're not even close to being the majority here.
Similar threads
