Groundhog246
Contributor
Braunbehrens once bubbled...
Not sure about where you get this info about the Danforth, but it's true that the Danforth can "swim" if there is enough speed. This is especially true of the aluminum Danforths.
Partly personal experience. I had a steel Danforth pull out (5 to 1 scope and chain) when the wind shifted. The boat had moved about 50 feet and built up enough momentum that the anchor would not set again and we ended up ON the beach. It was a nice sand bottom, which should have been near ideal holding. That anchor went in the dumpster at the marina and I bought a Bruce the next day.
I'm also not sure that "get the next size up" is such a good idea. I used to subsribe to that idea, but now I think that you are better off using that weight in chain, rather than a larger anchor.
Most companies base their recommendations on low to moderate windspeeds. Not sure why they want to sell you a smaller anchor. If you read the fine print many suggest one size up if you're likely to experience strong winds. Personally, I've anchored in the evening with 5 knots winds and woke up at 3am with 40 knots. Certainly chain is a key part, too many with a piece of rope on an anchor with no chain.
As for the 7 to one scope, I don't think so. Sure, this is what's recommended, but I frequently anchor in over 100 ft of water. I'm not going to carry 700 ft of rode, that's just plain silly. We typically get away with a lot less, but then there is some data that the deeper your anchor the less scope you need.
7 to 1 is for max holding, aimed at heavy winds, 5 to 1 usually adequate, 3 to 1 as the earlier post suggested is IMHO foolish. Never heard of using less in deeper water. I've seen a heavy weight shackled to the joint between rope and chain used to reduce rode length, similar effect to longer chain, usually when anchoring where there's not much room to swing.