You can try over at
www.ScubaBoard.com for some great info. Let's face it, we are far, far more dynamic than any agency's rescue manual. You will find lot's of info here that is missing in the manuals.
__________________
I agree 100% and plan to launch a thread someday "In defense of internet learning" !
Look at who responds to these questions? Sure, you get an appropriate range of opinions, but you won't find better information on a whole range of things, IMO.
I understand the reluctance some have when it comes to deco, etc. BUT, you get a full range of qualified (and a few not, most people can distinguish) divers answering and demonstarting the concepts, math, etc.
I have found more arguments FOR internet (SB) learning than against for the discerning diver.
back on topic, I thought the post advocating the desire for both divers to be close to nuetral was the best because it does not take much finning to bring someone up. In my rescue class we practiced this a lot. It was hard to hold the reg in place and vent though. I am not that convinced there would actually be a lot of venting going on.
I wonder if the international rescusitation medical committees that decide ACLS and EFR protocols bibliography would be interesting to you Tim. Lynne would know what kind of data/studies could be found there. In my experience it is mostly things like defibrillation timelines and outcomes..that sort of thing. Check the bibliographies in manuals.