Report: Sea levels to increase by 20 ft does that mean......

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

There's a good myths v. facts on the site for those that are seriously interested.

http://www.fightglobalwarming.com/page.cfm?tagID=274

"Though natural amounts of CO2 vary from 180 to 300 parts per million (ppm), today's CO2 levels are around 380 ppm. That's 25% more than the highest natural levels, looking back 650,000 years. Increased CO2 levels have corresponded with higher average temperatures throughout that long record. (Boden, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center)"
 
I respectfully disagree with your opinion. There are a growing number of experts that believe that this is not just a cyclic phenomenon.

This is a situation that requires some attention and not the caviler attitude of recent years that has diminished the stature of scientific research and opinion.

It isn’t all tree huggers and the media:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/16/60minutes/main1323169.shtml

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11385475
 
I suggest all those who in favor of reducing global warming please leave the planet. All the hot air you are spewing is simply adding to the problem. And take those who burn cow chips, etc. in "developing countries" with you.

Just say "yes" to nucular ;) power !!!
 
cfelliot:
I respectfully disagree with your opinion. There are a growing number of experts that believe that this is not just a cyclic phenomenon.

This is a situation that requires some attention and not the caviler attitude of recent years that has diminished the stature of scientific research and opinion.

It isn’t all tree huggers and the media:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/16/60minutes/main1323169.shtml

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11385475

His post was not his opinion.

And since when was CBS or MSNBC not been the media?
 
Mo2vation:
By 2110 this house will be on beachfront property.


alas, by 2120 it will be six feet under water

:10:
 
Green_Manelishi:
His post was not his opinion.

And since when was CBS or MSNBC not been the media?

Yes, It WAS my opinion - and I'm sticking to it.
Second, where did I say the links weren't from the main stream media???
Damn, should I have quoted FOX to be creditable?
 
at least fair and balanced. ;)
 

Back
Top Bottom