Reliable CO2 sensor. How far are we to achieve that in diving applications?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

WOB0.01J

Contributor
Messages
98
Reaction score
45
Location
New Hampshire
# of dives
100 - 199
I have been using my se7en for about 2 years now, and been enjoying diving it so far (about 35 dives in with a lot of ups and downs). I have been thinking about moving towards the M28 and solid-state sensor in the near future since SSS is having excellent track record as for right now. ( I just dive the paddle right now, and it has served me well )

From said that, what exactly is the difficulty to achieve a reliable CO2 sensor technology? How far are we until we reach this point? IMHO SSS sensors are reliable as it is plus CO2 sensor would probably make CCR divers' way more confident about the dive. Because a CO2 hit is probably the most frightening part with rebreathers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OTF
Lungfish apparently have this cracked:
 
Interesting! I did not know that.
Common CO2 sensors are NDIR. CO2 molecules absorb specific wavelengths of infrared light,
thus resulting in less light reaches sensor as more CO2 molecules present in surrounding air.
Water vapours also absorb same specific wavelengths of infrared light, affecting measurement.
Also, NDIR sensors are somewhat slow, 30 seconds for measuring cycle is a huge
amount of time in rebreather application, and some sensors are more slow, up to minutes.
 
Lungfish apparently have this cracked:
"Though how it works is a closely-guarded secret, Lungfish claims that the sensor correctly distinguishes CO2 from water vapour/moisture or other gases in the loop eliminating false alarms and or false positives. [Ed. note: Lungfish has not specified the sensing technology they are using]"

That's quite a choice to make in this field.

It's promising to hear that whatever it is might actually work though!
 

Back
Top Bottom