DKB01
Registered
Looks like your original questions have been answered......good luck and keep learning. Diving is a great sport!
DB
DB
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Oh man, here we go again....where does this nonsense come from? I guess the dive gear/instruction industry is really doing a good job of brainwashing people into thinking that their life depends on A)buying expensive gear and B)having it serviced incessantly by someone with potentially one day of 'certification'.
No offense, but didn't you pay attention in your OW class when they were teaching you the buddy system, air sharing, you know, little details like that? And maybe you could enlighten us about how regulator failure results in no air being available and subsequent death. Has it ever happened to you? Why aren't you dead, then?
I took both my daughter's and my regs in for servicing from the LSD that I purchased them from and within a month of her doing her DM course hers fell apart and mine had an internal setting too loose and I was going thru too much air.
My whole take on adhering to the manufacture's recommendations on annual services is to reduce risk...my risk. Until someone can prove that not having the manufacture's recommende service is safer...
First of all, thank you for taking my rant in good cheer, it speaks well of you as a person.
The example you provided that I referenced above demonstrates clearly two things that run counter to your earlier positions:
1. That having regulators serviced by the dealer can (and unfortunately often does) result in a greater likelihood of failure than does leaving a well-working regulator alone.
2. That regulator failures can and do happen, and people survive all the time. Dive behavior is what determines safety, not equipment. If regulator failure were in fact life threatening, don't you think that the technicians working on them would have a rigorous, peer-reviewed licensing procedure?