Regulator service

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

It is clearly possible for fine sand to cause the damage described with a balanced 2nd. And the common design for such a balance chamber is just vulnerable to that problem. I believe the single o-ring design is the norm and was used by scubapro for at least 20 years. Even the 2 o-ring design does not entirely cure the problem. It just provides 2 fences that have to be breached instead of one. So it should just take more time for the problem to materialize.

I don't believe anyone is still making an unbalanced adjustable barrel poppet 2nd. Performance is in the same ballpark as the balanced design and it eliminated the vulnerability of the balance chamber. I really like my old Scubapro R109s. Closest thing now would probably be the Oceanic Delta which is a user adjustable classic downstream design
 
You dive behind someone like Ben who kicks up a lot of silt and you will have to service your regulators more often. Try to dive NEXT to him, and keep out of that silt trail he leaves. eyebrow

Mark
 
Ben_ca:
As far as a dive at Monastery being the culprit.... I say that would be a big no.

For the people out there not familiar with Nor Cal beaches Monastery is more like a pebble beach. Large grains of course sand.

I had more sand in all kinds of places after last weeks monastery dive than any other dive I have done. In my regs, my camera housing latches, all over my BC etc. etc.

to top it all off, the vis sucked too :(
 

Back
Top Bottom