Red Flags or Misplaced Expectations?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Interesting.. Schools- or better yet, places of learning, are in the business of selling an education. They don't care if you have to take out a loan, a parent + loan, refinance your house, borrow from friends and relatives...or anything else. Most kids and parents do not look into how much money you can actually make in a career, or go so far as to investigate the career itself. Go shadow somebody for a month...
What the school sells and what is truth has a large gap. And not just traditional colleges, any specialty also.. helicopter pilots (stupid ridicolous amount to pay to learn for very few jobs), Social Workers (need a masters to get in the door at entry level pay).. and I am sure there are a lot more.. Oh, yeah, Scuba Instructors.....
It’s up to the individual seeking the career to do their homework before investing thousands of dollars on an education for a dead end job.
If a job was offered with top pay then I’d want a written contract.
 
Why can't you guys boot people from these threads when they have nothing to say about a given topic?
The rule here is against overly harsh posting, not against ignorance. People come here to learn, which is why there is a large red LEARNING ZONE banner at the top:
learningzone.png


If you would prefer a different forum where being unaware is disallowed but being a jerk is allowed, feel free, they're out there. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
 
So, to the OP (Who has probably long since wandered off), all of those issues sound like red flags with that particular dive shop. They don't seem to be invested in you or even following through on the things you paid for. I think you would be well advised to continue your training elsewhere.

That said, I find the whole approach to SCUBA education...curious

Part of what I do for a living is to test aspiring firefighters seeking their initial certification out of academy. You know what the requirements to be a firefighter instructor are?

Be a firefighter.

Yup, that's it.

I am certified as an Instructor 1, which is a pre-requisite to be an evaluator. That class was 4 days of powerpoint, a written exam, and teaching a 5 minute class from prepared materials in front of an evaluator. Many, perhaps most, people teaching academies are not instructor 1 rated (and really aren't losing out on anything because of it, that class is a joke).

In the fire service, as soon as you are certified in something, you are considered competent to teach it. When I was testing for my Firefighter 2 cert there was some confusion about whether I was taking the test or administering it and got written down as doing both. The State Fire Marshal's Office caught that and told the person running the test "If you're that hard up for evaluators, run him through first and if he passes he can evaluate the rest".

So my point on all this is that from my perspective it does look like the dive instruction market is something of a scam. There are good instructors out there (I had one), but that is probably more about some people being naturally good at it then whatever massive amount of training and "mentoring" they receive.

The thing that makes the firefighter certification system work is third party evaluation. There are written standards for each skill and an unbiased evaluator comes in and grades each candidate against those standards. The standards are the same nation-wide and so it doesn't matter where someone was trained, if they are an IFSAC Firefighter 1 I know what to expect.

I feel like offering this kind of system, even on a voluntary basis, would be a boon to the dive industry. It would give people some level of confidence that the person in front of them actually is at least minimally competent in the water, and that that competency has been evaluated by someone besides the person who instructed them. Right now we have a situation where no one trusts anyone elses training or certification, and that is hardly conducive to a healthy industry.
 
I feel like offering this kind of system, even on a voluntary basis, would be a boon to the dive industry. It would give people some level of confidence that the person in front of them actually is at least minimally competent in the water, and that that competency has been evaluated by someone besides the person who instructed them.
This is not going to happen as it would cut into the agency's and the ITs/CDs business. The model is set up to produce a large amount of instructors that pay into the system and than to be low skill cheap labour on a constant basis.
From the point of view of the CDs and agancies, the system works great. If they increased quality, fewer instructor would pay membership fees, buys material and t-shirts and the shops would actually have to pay more for labour.
The people who are defending this system (even though they know how it works) and try to keep information about pay under wraps are helping to the standard low.

If you would prefer a different forum where being unaware is disallowed but being a jerk is allowed, feel free, they're out there. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
So it's ok to bash a tiny little mum and pop shop like seaskin based on made up stuff but cooperation like PADI need to be protected. I guess it depends what the sb staff likes and doesn't like.
 
The thing that makes the firefighter certification system work is third party evaluation.

competency has been evaluated by someone besides the person who instructed them.
But this 3rd party evaluation is exactly what happens with scuba instruction.
 
So, to the OP (Who has probably long since wandered off), all of those issues sound like red flags with that particular dive shop. They don't seem to be invested in you or even following through on the things you paid for. I think you would be well advised to continue your training elsewhere.

That said, I find the whole approach to SCUBA education...curious

Part of what I do for a living is to test aspiring firefighters seeking their initial certification out of academy. You know what the requirements to be a firefighter instructor are?

Be a firefighter.

Yup, that's it.

I am certified as an Instructor 1, which is a pre-requisite to be an evaluator. That class was 4 days of powerpoint, a written exam, and teaching a 5 minute class from prepared materials in front of an evaluator. Many, perhaps most, people teaching academies are not instructor 1 rated (and really aren't losing out on anything because of it, that class is a joke).

In the fire service, as soon as you are certified in something, you are considered competent to teach it. When I was testing for my Firefighter 2 cert there was some confusion about whether I was taking the test or administering it and got written down as doing both. The State Fire Marshal's Office caught that and told the person running the test "If you're that hard up for evaluators, run him through first and if he passes he can evaluate the rest".

So my point on all this is that from my perspective it does look like the dive instruction market is something of a scam. There are good instructors out there (I had one), but that is probably more about some people being naturally good at it then whatever massive amount of training and "mentoring" they receive.

The thing that makes the firefighter certification system work is third party evaluation. There are written standards for each skill and an unbiased evaluator comes in and grades each candidate against those standards. The standards are the same nation-wide and so it doesn't matter where someone was trained, if they are an IFSAC Firefighter 1 I know what to expect.

I feel like offering this kind of system, even on a voluntary basis, would be a boon to the dive industry. It would give people some level of confidence that the person in front of them actually is at least minimally competent in the water, and that that competency has been evaluated by someone besides the person who instructed them. Right now we have a situation where no one trusts anyone elses training or certification, and that is hardly conducive to a healthy industry.
I was told that part of the cost of my training would be to pay for an independent, non-shop affiliated, evaluator to evaluate my skills as part of the completion of ITC. If I understood this aspect of the instructor training correctly, this is akin to the "third party evaluation" you describe.
 
I was told that part of the cost of my training would be to pay for an independent, non-shop affiliated, evaluator to evaluate my skills as part of the completion of ITC. If I understood this aspect of the instructor training correctly, this is akin to the "third party evaluation" you describe.
Not even close. It is an employee/contractor for the agency.

I don't think firefighters continue to pay fees to the company that the evaluator represents.
 
I was told that part of the cost of my training would be to pay for an independent, non-shop affiliated, evaluator to evaluate my skills as part of the completion of ITC. If I understood this aspect of the instructor training correctly, this is akin to the "third party evaluation" you describe.
The evaluator usually is a buddy/business partner of the IT. The IT wouldn't send you to an evaluator that fails students and doesn't play ball. It's virtually impossible to fail.

On paper it's 3rd party. In reality the IT and the evaluator depend on each other to make easy money.
 
Apparently not.

Has absolutely nothing to do with how instructor training is conducted or anything else related to 'careers in diving'. I assume you've also never worked in the business.
Were in my comment did it say anything negative about instructor training or careers in diving. I said it is a niche market, there are plenty of niche markets out there that people work in that the vast majority of the world care nothing about but the a small few in that market can be fanatical about. Also you obviously didn't read all my posts. I've been actively involved in the industry for 16+ years but never as my main source of income and I went into knowing it would never be.
 
I've been actively involved in the industry for 16+ years
Guiding people on weekends as a divemaster doesn't give you any inside into the industry and I wouldn't consider that working either. Weekend DMs are customers that dive with other customers. When something costs money (being a weeked DM costs money) it's not a job, it's a hobby.
The fact that scuba is a niche market has nothing to do with anything in the thread.
 

Back
Top Bottom