gangrel441
Contributor
H2Andy:well... mitigating the damage done is integral to dealing with equipment failure.
there are lessons to be learned from divers who survived equipment failures.
my point was that they try to avoid those scenarios, as though equipment
never breaks... because they don't want to make new divers and potential divers
fear equipment and decide to stop diving or not start diving
i just think it's an interesting editorial bias, that they try to avoid mentioning
equipment failurers... of course, the bulk of their advertisers are equipment
manufacturers...
:33:
Very true. I do find it interesting in this month's issue that they referred to the divers as "reasonably experienced" divers, but clearly Jack weighted himself down enough to be a boat anchor, and Janet had "not made a dive since the late 1990's." Then when all is said and done, the lesson basically amounts to "Don't repair a BC. Buy and new one..." and "if you get trouble under water, get positive." How about "if you can't stay at the surface without inflating your BC, take about 20 lbs off your weight belt." Or, if they are going to push a class (like they do with Rescue in this one), how about "take Peak Performance Bouyancy, and memorize the textbook in the process."