RAID Cave 1 - Good Course?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Search for a good instructor. Then the agency is not important. The best instructor can be worse for you if personalities or teaching style don't match.
If you want to do cave in sidemount or ccr, then you have to look to other agencies than gue. Most other agencies offer cave in sidemount or ccr.

The agency is important. It defines the baseline standards and requirements. It becomes far more important to instructor shop if the agency isn't strict about what its instructors are teaching and what criteria they're evaluating. And when you're just getting into cave/technical diving, it's hard to know what to look for in an instructor or how to determine the quality of instruction you'll get. I know instructors from various other agencies that I'd put up against the best anyone has to offer. But I also know of a few instructors I'd be nervous about even sharing a cave with. That's never a problem with GUE because of how strict they are with instructor standards and course content.

Also, you can do cave SM and CCR through GUE. But they're rightly considered more advanced classes, so you need relevant experience before heading down those paths.
 
Yes, the agency can be important IF:
You can NOT start CCR or SM in gue, and that is the bigbig problem. When I started diving I was already interested in sidemount and ccr. That was not possible within gue then, completely not. So for me it was not the agency to start technical diving. The fundamentals has the big problem that it is required and in any other agency it is optional. If an evaluation was possible I had maybe done normoxic and then T2. Just to know from different agencies (I have taken courses from different agencies, different instructors, sometimes absolutely NON-DIR where I dove DIR, sometimes absolutely DIR-style. This gave me a big and broad vision about technical diving and how people do it. Money is not unlimited and if you want to do 100m dives, you need a full tx cert after you normoxic card, whatever agency and not a fundies pass. You can do an evaluation, no problem, but no, not courses again. I dive with all kind of divers. And no, the differences are not that big. Of course you have old fashioned seashorses in the water with bad finningtechniques, but overal it is not that bad as sometimes stated here. But I have also seen gue tech rated divers that didn't has practised and their skills can be lower than from another diver that practised.

We were refused for a 50m dive for project baseline as we dove ccr and oc in a mixed team, that was impossible then. But then people move to ccr and other agencies, and gue start ccr, after T2. But that is also changed to after t1 now. Sidemount is now also possible, but still not as basic course.
Remember the time, deco by head, ration deco. I learned in early days pragmatic deco. And now, wow, even gue uses a decoplanner, pragmatising the stops and hey, that is what I learned already before they adopted it. But I use it also for best mix instead of standardgases. Standardgases are nice, but sometimes a best mix is a better choice. I teach the advanced nitrox course. 42m on air. I would never use helium myself already at 30.2m, that is in my eyes a waste of that expensive rare gas. But if you want to do, no problem. It is a freedom divers have. My personal limit on air depends on darkness, cold, etc. But I don't teach the technical diver, I have to dive on air also then and am responsible. Then I will say do normoxic trimix.

Remember all divers are human. The level of the diver depends partly on the instructor, but maybe more after THEIR WILLING to practise AFTER a course. As soon as you think you are already on the level, your level goes down. This happens with divers from every agency. Divers who know their theoryknowledge is bad and they learn this slow, they need to practise this after a course again.

I do a lot of things 'DIR/GUE-ish'. But yes, I also can take ccr, sidemount, sm-ccr. Also I took a month ago a normal bcd, wow, I like that freedom. If people learn to dive with me, they get a normal bcd, but I use a longhose. And explain them why. If people decide to buy a normal regulator set with octopus, no problem, I will also teach you then. I also dive solo, very important for me on some dives.

As there is no proof that agency X has more accidents than agency Y, there is no proof that 1 agency is better than another. It is just a personal opinion. Evaluation in diving is seen in every agency. And every agency has possitive points and negative points. If the negative points are limiting for you or so big you cannot agree, choose for another. You have the freedom.
Yes, sometimes there are bad instructors, but what I said the best instructor is a bad choice if personalities don't fit.

So to start with a next course: search for an instructor that is allowed to teach the course you want and decided if the personality fits. Then look if his/her teachingqualities are on your norm. And norm can be different from diver to diver. If you think RAID is the way to go, why not?
I only would say if you choose it and want to use in Europe, you must know that raid is almost unknown here and maybe you get problems that the card is not accepted. I point I would figure out if you want to use it here.
 
I think the pipeline to becoming an instructor is important. The more mentorship and co-teaching a candidate has along the way benefits everyone.
 
I think the pipeline to becoming an instructor is important. The more mentorship and co-teaching a candidate has along the way benefits everyone.
And the instructor must want to tell about it . Some wont tell details.

Also important is that the instructor knows from other caves in the world. You cannot visit all. But only know the same region and allways same dives in cavediving is same as only houselake experience.
 
If an evaluation was possible I had maybe done normoxic and then T2. Just to know from different agencies (I have taken courses from different agencies, different instructors, sometimes absolutely NON-DIR where I dove DIR, sometimes absolutely DIR-style.
Actually it is possible. You need an IE to approve you. Having taken a class from an IE they are not easy graders, but it is possible. Someone here said the first GUE class they took was T2. You’ll need to go dive with them and convince them you know what you need to know and and can do the skills to standard.
 
Yeah... there seems to be a lot of that going around...

Why is sidemounting in situations where restriction is not the primary consideration so broadly disdained? If someone is more comfortable in the sidemount setup, and it is being done properly, why is it wrong?
 
Why is sidemounting in situations where restriction is not the primary consideration so broadly disdained? If someone is more comfortable in the sidemount setup, and it is being done properly, why is it wrong?

Added complexity with no benefit. Same reason it's a bit pointless to dive Peacock on a breather unless you're just trying to build hours on the unit. You need to recognize what tool is best for the job at hand and balance its necessity against potential drawbacks.
 
I guess I don't see what's more complex about it, beyond donning tanks. I'm just starting down the path, and to me doubles and an iso manifold have proven far more complicated and difficult to use.

I also have a physical issue with my neck(genetic) that makes it even more difficult for me to use iso bar doubles. Sidemount has proven to be the best tool for my situation period, but GUE will now allow it.

I dont have an issue with GUE, but I'm not understanding the "more complicated" assertion.
 
Actually it is possible. You need an IE to approve you. Having taken a class from an IE they are not easy graders, but it is possible. Someone here said the first GUE class they took was T2. You’ll need to go dive with them and convince them you know what you need to know and and can do the skills to standard.

Totally of topic!

Yes Kevin is right, I personally know someone who got an IE to approve him skipping T1 (normoxic) and go straight to the T2 course. There was some context and some conditions:

- context: he was already C2 at GUE (so understood very well the standardised procedures), he was already normoxic trained by another agency (IANTD)
- conditions: The instructor told the student that he would really scrutinize his performance the first 2 days and if he was not up to par, he would be disallowed to continue the course.

He got his T2 :)

To the OP, you can't go wrong with GUE when it comes to cave training. There are other instructors from other agencies who are very good as well, but you will need to do your homework to ID these instructors. To be honest I'm not sure with your current experience level that you'll be able to do this. Finally no matter what agency you chose, take a fundies course, it will give you a very good baseline to continue with.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom