That's the point...Re run your example while keeping the mans displacement the same ... Then the more it weighs the more it sinks. Your example has more than one factor changing. But your argument centers on only one component of the problem.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
That's the point...Re run your example while keeping the mans displacement the same ... Then the more it weighs the more it sinks. Your example has more than one factor changing. But your argument centers on only one component of the problem.
Im sure there are other factors involved but looking at only the density aspect of things, here is what i got formgooglle searches.
I assume that pine depending on what time of year a whether it is sap or water filled makes a difference and may explain the wide range of the density value.
The more solid things become the higher the speed of sound. Not saying that elasticity has no play in this ,,,,,,,it is an important factor in sound transmission.
i looked up speed of sound for _________ then density of ________ here are the numbers
Material ---- density ---- speed
--------------- kg/m3 ---- meters
AIR ------------- 1.3 ------------- 343
WATER ---------- 997 -------------1500
PINE ------------ 350 - 850 ------ 4000
STEEL ----------- 8050 ------------- 6000
As a retired submarine sonarman,,,,, some of this very entertaining.
this sounds like the argument that ,,,,,hot electric stove element did not cause the blister the fluid in the body going to he skin surface did.
Exactly....Re run your example while keeping the mans displacement the same ... Then the more it weighs the more it sinks. Your example has more than one factor changing. But your argument centers on only one component of the problem.
prpobably so they probably told us where to be so you could find us. Just teasing. It was a fun job for sure. P3 guy I am guessing?As a retired ASW aircraft sonar operator I was looking for you.
True that is a deliniation that is not taught in diving or anything else outside of speciality training. Again diving is a very basic level.knowledge when it comes to such things.Saying "denser objects tend to have a higher speed of sound" and saying "objects have a higher speed of sound BECAUSE they are denser" are not the same thing
Saying "denser objects tend to have a higher speed of sound" and saying "objects have a higher speed of sound BECAUSE they are denser" are not the same thing
This is the flaw in ALL these arguments...the media of different densities do NOT have the same compessibility.given the same compresability
Yes Rikk that is right. it is a matter of which ((density or compressibility)) is the predominant driving factor on the end result. because temp and other factors also effect Speed of sound such as depth which for discussion purposes is moot because none of us dive in the depth range where pressure has an effect.Speed of Sound in Water - The Physics Factbook
"Sound is a type of longitudinal, mechanical wave. They need a medium to propagate and will not travel through a vacuum. Sound travels at different speed in different media. The speed of sound is determined by the density (ρ) and compressibility (K) of the medium. Density is the amount of material in a given volume, and compressibility is a measure of how much a substance could be compacted for a given pressure. The denser and the more compressible, the slower the sound waves would travel. Water is much more dense than air, but since it is nearly incompressible the speed of sound is about four times faster in water than in air."
So D is closest to the correct answer. Speed of sound is roughly 4 times as fast but not because of density but because of incompressability.
Both are incorrect. Density is inversely related to speed of sound., A denser medium will have a lower speed of sound, given the same compresability.
I have worked on a lot of construction jobs that involved blasting. The speed of sound through rock is higher than in air, more dense but rocks are not easily compressed. You feel the blast through your feet before you hear the sound of the blast.
To suggest that making something denser will allow sound to travel faster through it is also a fallacy. That's the point.to suggest that making something heavier will allow it to float is a falicy.