Mike1967
Contributor
C'mon dude, we're divers not physicists.At my exams at the university, I usually reject students who answer "by memory" and do not show a true understanding of physics..
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
C'mon dude, we're divers not physicists.At my exams at the university, I usually reject students who answer "by memory" and do not show a true understanding of physics..
Having a bubble of air around the ears slows down the speed of sound, restoring at least partially ITD and ILD...Speaking of directionality, I read that people with the masks that have the ear muff attachments for easier equalization report that they get some sense of sound directionality returned underwater.
Exactly.C'mon dude, we're divers not physicists.
These questions are about the basics we should know, all the formulas and exacts you sprook we don't. They make you sound you very intelligent, and I'm sure you are, but divers don't need to know all that.A lack of understanding is not admissible for a diver...
The formula does not matter, what matters is understanding the physics fact.These questions are about the basics we should know, all the formulas and exacts you sprook we don't. They make you sound you very intelligent, and I'm sure you are, but divers don't need to know all that.
OK, this is very clear! And explains how my son, who is dyslexic and did not understand anything from the PADI manual, still managed easily to be certified AOW...Again, these are PADI questions not university physics. That's all I'm saying.
So these tests evaluate memory, and not the real understanding... That is crap.
At my exams at the university, I usually reject students who answer "by memory" and do not show a true understanding of physics..
I disagree. It is just like a train passing.Not true, unfortunately. The pitch change is truly minimal, for two factors: first the speed of the boat is limited (not like an ambulance on the highway). And then the speed of the boat is a very minimal fraction of the speed of sound, as the latter is much larger than in air.
Conclusion: no significant Doppler effect telling you if the boat already passed through your position and is going away...
You can evaluate this only by the reduction in noise level, when the boat is already at a significant distance.
The physics are the same, the size of the effect isn't.I disagree. It is just like a train passing.