Still don't really get it.
Possibly that is because you are thinking of RNT as a direct representation of the physical amount of nitrogen in your body (e.g. your apples analogy). It is NOT. RNT is a parameter used to quantitatively express the potential effect of residual nitrogen on future dives, in terms of
how long you can stay at a particular depth on those future dives. It is not a real number, in terms of how much nitrogen is left after the first dive (or a series of dives). Rather, it is an indirect method of expressing nitrogen amount, in terms of time. The tables represent that amount of nitrogen as 'Minutes deducted from the NDL', for the particular depth of the next dive. It could also be presented as a percentage. But, that would then require everyone using the tables to perform calculations involving multiplication.
Instead, virtually all tables attempting to gauge the impact of residual nitrogen distill that impact down to something that can be
subtracted, from NDL. In fact, NDL itself is an attempt to represent the amount of nitrogen taken on during a dive. It, too, is an indirect method of expressing nitrogen amount, in terms of time.
Also, part of the question you raised earlier involved the apparent difference in residual nitrogen at different dive depths. Keep in mind that the NDL for deeper dives is already shorter, so the 'amount' of nitrogen is adjusted to reflect that lower NDL. Don't expect it to be a linear relationship.