If you like your current Atomic regs, why not get another, identical first stage? (Or, are you saying your two first stages are different?) The fewer brands / models, the easier life is (although that may just be MY personal idiosyncracy - see comment, below).I think that I will try to have a separate travel regulator so that I don't need to be always switching hoses... So the next question is which regs? Right now, I have two Atomic first stages and three Atomic second stages, a B2 and two Z2s (B2 primary, one Z2 backup, one Z2 on my pony bottle).
With no disrespect intended to your mentor - many of us develop personal preferences, and individualized approaches to our gear, as we gain experience, that we then rationalize with some type of explanantion or justification. I wouldn't necessarily call these approaches idiosyncracies, but many of us have them. There are a few things that I do / prefer (even 'recommend') that are not necesarily based on any objective data whatsoever. I prefer to dive the same second stage on both regs in doubles, because I want 1) equivalent performance, and 2) easier servicing in the field (same second stage kit). Are those validated reasons? Well, they are for me. Plus, I have a bolt snap on my primary (right post) second stage hose, and a bungee necklace on my secondary (left post) second stage, so I can usually tell them apart.IMy mentor told me that she preferred to have two different brands of second stages, for two reasons - (1) so that if one failed due to environmental reasons, both would be less likely to fail for the same reason . . . and (2) so that it's easy to tell which one you are using by the weight, etc.