Hi Eric,
FWIW I dive my FP & Oxycheq MK V wing without the use of the rails. I have a DAM with a Phoenix nozzle. There is sufficient room for the wing to fit either in front of or behind the can. The only accommodation I made was to rotate the can's band clamp so that the connecting hardware is at the 3 o'clock position.....I am very pleased with this setup.
Re the weight saving: Considering the thickness required to have the proper strength, how much difference in weight is there between a SS FP and an Al FP?
Cheers,
Couv
FWIW I dive my FP & Oxycheq MK V wing without the use of the rails. I have a DAM with a Phoenix nozzle. There is sufficient room for the wing to fit either in front of or behind the can. The only accommodation I made was to rotate the can's band clamp so that the connecting hardware is at the 3 o'clock position.....I am very pleased with this setup.
Re the weight saving: Considering the thickness required to have the proper strength, how much difference in weight is there between a SS FP and an Al FP?
Cheers,
Couv
I always thought my plate was pretty slick using it with a double hose but I didn't get a lot of takers in the vintage crowd, especially over at VDH.
There were a few here who got one for using with a Pheonix. I had to set those up with a special tall rail to allow for the additional stick out of the reg. I never heard back from any of them so I have no idea if they worked or not.
I guess the Freedom Plate wasn't "Vintage" enough for the rest of the crowd, but then I always wondered, if they were so pure then what about the Pheonix?
So now there is a brand new modern day double hose regulator (which I think is great! BTW), so does that mean that the Freedom Plate is OK now too since it's modern but retro in design?
Looking at the pictures It should work just as good (or better) than one of the plastic packs.