I'm recently preparing for my next GUE Tech 1 course but also have joined a new local BSAC club as part of my plan to get into a local diving community.
I notice that BSAC does not really officially sponsor the "primary donate" techniques - and after reading a few of their arguments, I start to make sense of it: primary donate involves removal and replacement of a "flowing" regulator, which increases its risk to freeflow and regulator freezing especially in ice-cold water.
However, I believe everyone has a clear and good reason (especially in this sub-forum here) why they use primary donate + a long hose and stop using an octopus. There have been numerous occasions in the past where I saw a octo diver cannot find their octos when needed, because they have been accidentally taken out of the stowage position by currents/entanglement/themselves when blowing an open-ended dSMB, and developed this into a panick.
I just did a sport diver pool training with the local club, in jacket and secondary-donate octopus, and I saw other students taking at least 10 seconds to resume breathing from the secondary octo because of the various reasons their buddies' octos were either displaced or got stuck in the jacket that they could not remove without excessive force. It should have taken me 10 seconds to pull out the stuck octo hose from my buddy, whereas even two months before taking my first Fundies class my buddy and I could do a primary donate drill and resume breathing within 2 seconds maximum.
This question is really targeting those who've been diving extensively in the UK or other similarly cold places - do you think regulator freeflowing is a big and bad issue? And do you think there's a reason to NOT use primary donate as stated above?
P.S.: I'm now using a set of diaphram regs with freezing kits, which are supposed to reduce the risk of a freeflowing. However, I do have a set of piston regulators that I might use from time to time, despite the last time I used it at the sheering cold 5 degrees celsius it just works as normal.
I notice that BSAC does not really officially sponsor the "primary donate" techniques - and after reading a few of their arguments, I start to make sense of it: primary donate involves removal and replacement of a "flowing" regulator, which increases its risk to freeflow and regulator freezing especially in ice-cold water.
However, I believe everyone has a clear and good reason (especially in this sub-forum here) why they use primary donate + a long hose and stop using an octopus. There have been numerous occasions in the past where I saw a octo diver cannot find their octos when needed, because they have been accidentally taken out of the stowage position by currents/entanglement/themselves when blowing an open-ended dSMB, and developed this into a panick.
I just did a sport diver pool training with the local club, in jacket and secondary-donate octopus, and I saw other students taking at least 10 seconds to resume breathing from the secondary octo because of the various reasons their buddies' octos were either displaced or got stuck in the jacket that they could not remove without excessive force. It should have taken me 10 seconds to pull out the stuck octo hose from my buddy, whereas even two months before taking my first Fundies class my buddy and I could do a primary donate drill and resume breathing within 2 seconds maximum.
This question is really targeting those who've been diving extensively in the UK or other similarly cold places - do you think regulator freeflowing is a big and bad issue? And do you think there's a reason to NOT use primary donate as stated above?
P.S.: I'm now using a set of diaphram regs with freezing kits, which are supposed to reduce the risk of a freeflowing. However, I do have a set of piston regulators that I might use from time to time, despite the last time I used it at the sheering cold 5 degrees celsius it just works as normal.