2 Big 2 Fail
Contributor
I wore hard (old non-permeable) contact lens for many years, went to glasses (which eventually became trifocals), and also have soft contact lenses to use when I want. The contact lenses are mostly used for water surface activities, like kayaking, where splashing is a nuisance. I dive with a single vision mask with -3.00 correction. I own an old Tusa mask and a new Promate mask. I like the Tusa, because its lenses are units, looking just like the uncorrected lenses. The Promate isn't bad. Its lenses are, I suspect, plain lenses with a correction lens applied to the inside. The Tusa provides a somewhat more natural view, but the silicon is breaking down with age and starting to tear. The Promate has a slight movement effect as you move your head, probably because the lenses are physically thicker. Both provide sharp vision. (The Promate seems to be a decent mask, but I haven't had it long.)
Now, my near vision is close to being right with no correction, so with the Rx I have a bit of blur at reading/gauge distance, but I can see gauges well enough to not make mistakes. WVUdiver1: Some of your decision depends on how poor your natural vision is. My -3.00 is not so bad that I would have any difficulty on the surface without the mask, getting around the shore or boat deck, for instance, or dealing with gear. Of course, a cheap pair of glasses tucked into a pocket could deal with that if it was a problem.
I have not dived with contacts. I find I am much more tolerant of a bit less than perfection with the mask that I wouldn't like in daily surface life. And the contacts seem to me to be one more source of a problem that would be essentially unfixable under water. My vision is poor enough that I definitely want one or the other method of correction, and the mask works well for me and is cheap and trouble-free. If Tusa can tell me if the current model of the mask will accept the lenses from the old one, I'll get another good mask and change the lenses out. Otherwise, the choice of mask isn't any different from choosing a non-Rx mask. The prescription lenses aren't so expensive that it's a deal breaker, considering the life of a mask and its contribution to the dive experience. I would guess, though, that if I wore contact lenses all day, every day, I'd probably wear them diving and take extra care sterilizing them (porous material to harbor water bugs). I don't wear the contact lenses that much, because trifocal is just so much easier and better with glasses.
Now, my near vision is close to being right with no correction, so with the Rx I have a bit of blur at reading/gauge distance, but I can see gauges well enough to not make mistakes. WVUdiver1: Some of your decision depends on how poor your natural vision is. My -3.00 is not so bad that I would have any difficulty on the surface without the mask, getting around the shore or boat deck, for instance, or dealing with gear. Of course, a cheap pair of glasses tucked into a pocket could deal with that if it was a problem.
I have not dived with contacts. I find I am much more tolerant of a bit less than perfection with the mask that I wouldn't like in daily surface life. And the contacts seem to me to be one more source of a problem that would be essentially unfixable under water. My vision is poor enough that I definitely want one or the other method of correction, and the mask works well for me and is cheap and trouble-free. If Tusa can tell me if the current model of the mask will accept the lenses from the old one, I'll get another good mask and change the lenses out. Otherwise, the choice of mask isn't any different from choosing a non-Rx mask. The prescription lenses aren't so expensive that it's a deal breaker, considering the life of a mask and its contribution to the dive experience. I would guess, though, that if I wore contact lenses all day, every day, I'd probably wear them diving and take extra care sterilizing them (porous material to harbor water bugs). I don't wear the contact lenses that much, because trifocal is just so much easier and better with glasses.