Stoo
Contributor
- Messages
- 3,505
- Reaction score
- 3,804
- # of dives
- 5000 - ∞
I use both the 10-17 and the 12-24. In spite of what the number look like, the 10-17 is MUCH wider. It's a fisheye. The other is a rectilinear lens.
I shoot wrecks here in the Great Lakes, and the 10-17 is VASTLY superior for that. It's also a pretty nice fish lens as long as you can get close.... like as in damn near bumping the beast in the head.
I haven't used the 10-17 in a tropical environment, but I think it will be great for scenics, but it won't be great for anything else, unless the subject is big. I 7' reef shark swimming past at a 10 foot distance is going to be less than impressive. The 12-24 is a pretty versatile lens and very good on a reef.
For Truk though, assuming you are after pics of big boats, I think the 10-17 is a way better lens. And I agree, take the 60 as well. It's pretty much my favorite lens for anything smallish...
I shoot wrecks here in the Great Lakes, and the 10-17 is VASTLY superior for that. It's also a pretty nice fish lens as long as you can get close.... like as in damn near bumping the beast in the head.
I haven't used the 10-17 in a tropical environment, but I think it will be great for scenics, but it won't be great for anything else, unless the subject is big. I 7' reef shark swimming past at a 10 foot distance is going to be less than impressive. The 12-24 is a pretty versatile lens and very good on a reef.
For Truk though, assuming you are after pics of big boats, I think the 10-17 is a way better lens. And I agree, take the 60 as well. It's pretty much my favorite lens for anything smallish...