CompuDude:
Let's leave personal insults out it, shall we? Do you really want to go there?
It is an opinion question on what size pool is adequate. I gave my opinion, and you are welcome to offer up your opinion as well.
Unless you are familiar with the OPs exact financial situation and the state of the local market he competes in, you are in no better position to make assumptions about what is financially reasonable and what is not than I am. I merely answered from a student's perspective... I've trained in smaller pools, and I've trained in larger pools. And even with smaller groups of students, I like a little more breathing room than the smallest pools offer.
The issue, again, comes down to economics. Economics is about costs and passing on of costs. Passing on costs defines pricing. The entire scuba industry is plagued by pricing issues.
If you go to a scuba store owner who has a pool at his/her facility, you find out quickly that the pool cost is very high. That is why bigger is not better, as you said, which was wrong.
If you take any of the basic college econ course, either intro, micro, or macro, they explain how costs drive pricing and how pricing is deterimined.
Its not personal, its just that your answer was wrong.
It may sound cute to say "bigger is better!" Girls joke about this all the time. It is cute, but incorrect.
By the way, that reminds me, did Tobin ever teach you about variable-weight plates that can be attached to your backplate, which allow you to modify the backplate up to 14 lbs each? I vaguely recall that you thought steel backplates are always 6 lbs. That was not personal either, but it practically blew your cookies when I called you on it.