First off, let me admit that, as Scott Adams put it, I have 'The Knack'. I'm an aerospace software engineer, and I was always the kid in science class that would mess up the curve for everybody else.
Blah, blah, blah, been there, done that, got the t-shirt. I've done software and hardware for machine vision, motion control, automated stress analysis, non-contact wafer oxide characterization, magnetic resonance RF optimization and gradient control, and industrial automation, AND I know a dozen phrases in Klingon. Loosen up that sphincter and learn to enjoy life a little. For starters, I've been working in dive training for 20 years and I've NEVER, EVER, heard or read the compound noun "negative buoyancy." I HAVE seen the adjective phrase "negatively buoyant" which does NOT denote a force or vector, but rather the state of an object, and is perfectly acceptable.
Beyond that, you claim that you are intensely bothered by misuse of technical terms, then go on to call gravity a MAGNETIC force. Kettle to pot, color check, over. You also used the word "always" redundantly in the sentence about correcting movies, so stick that in your Stunk & White. If you're going to play the OCD card, at least get it right.
In a nutshell, lighten up, Francis.