This is simply not true... Seriously - I believe you misunderstood.
Ok, I am not saying it correctly, using the correct terms and in the correct way (sorry).. it is the partial pressure that is the issue, and this gets really complex an I don't have a clue as to how to explain it. We obviously don't breath the 21% on the surface...we only absorb some of it and it gets transported into cells.
But here is where it gets really difficult..we only normally use a small amount of that O2, but O2 Tox is from having too high of partial pressure...on one hand it is not really more o2, but the effect is as if there was. And how all of the transport chemistry works with changing pressure is seriously complex.
So me bad, but everyone else seems to be avoiding it.
Trying to be correct here.. if you would pass out with say 8% serium O2, then at 99 ft, you would pass out at 2%.. which means you can make more CO2 than you can at the surface. On the other hand, the toxicity is also a partial pressure issue, so if 10% causes you to pass out, then at that same depth, you would effectively have 40% + that extra 6%, or a total of 64%.. which you would be dead at.
Looking at it in reverse, if you pass out at 10%.. you would pass out at 2.5% at 99 ft.
But none of that is true either.. as the response on both sides is not perfectly linear, and gas to fluid effect changes with pressure, and soluble gasses act different in the complex organic chemistry (and yes I was trained as an organic chemist, but worked as an engineer, so am not up to speed)
So all I can, for sure say, is that at depth, one has more available O2 to make CO2 and CO2 has a much stronger effect at depth...how much..I cannot find a hard answer to that.
While I cannot get the research the Navy did, I do know they actually tested the effect in a chamber at different depths, and the effect follows what was expected.
---------- Post added May 12th, 2015 at 09:12 PM ----------
My math puts that ~ 9 fpm.
You would be correct..but there was a lot of surge, so when you look at the jagged profile it was the up motion that had to be slower. At no point did I actually know what I was supped to do.. and at the very start (the up and down motion was stronger deeper (thankfully)), I had a small section where it exceeded 30 ft per minute, but the swell decrease as I went up, so it was only around 4 to 5 ft at around 46 ft, after that no issue. I tried to use my BP/W to hold me down, and so was putting air in and dumping it, so DAN used the low reading and every jump assumed it was from that, to get the 25 ft number...it also assumed that all the air I inhaled was actually pushed into my lungs.. guess that could be true.. don't know.