zboss:
The interesting thing is that municipalities are now starting to purposely dump raw sewage, rather than treated sewage into the ocean (under certain rules like "it must be x feet off-shore" because it's better for the environment then flushing tons of chlorine into the ocean. It turns out that the bacteria cannot live in the salty environment of the ocean.
Ugh. Whoever made those arguments should have their university degrees revoked, assuming they even have relevant degrees. That's an amazing amount of spin, that won't hold up under the most basic scrutiny. Sounds like some hair-brained government excuse to cop out of water quality standards. Dumping raw sewage into the environment is far worse than dumping chemically treated sewage, and everybody knows it. Raw sewage has undergone neither:
1. Particulate removal (primary treatment)
2. Chemical treatment (secondary treatment); U.S. standard
3. Biological treatment (tertiary treatment); most places don't do this
So it's basically a loose cannon. Chemical treatments do a good job of killing bacteria, and most facilities are efficient enough so that they're not using excessive amounts of chlorine. Besides, chlorine dumping is regulated; it's not supposed to be released in large amounts by treatment plants.
Saltwater won't kill all the sewage bacteria either. The stuff hiding in the particulates is protected, and there are various strains that can tolerate salinity, either actively or via encysting. Coastal areas near population centers are all-the-time reporting high fecal coliform counts, that track directly to storm runoff or sewage discharge.
Even IF all the bacteria are killed, there's still an enormous amount of nutrient waste entering the water column. That stuff directly promotes bacterial and algal growth (think fertilizer), leading to fun outbreaks of red tides and flesh-eating bacteria.
The further offshore you dump raw sewage, the worse the effect is on the ecosystem. That's because the further offshore you go, the more nutrient-limited the water column becomes. It's like popping a fire hydrant in the desert; sure it's great for a while, but keep it running, and you turn the area into a giant mudhole.
This idea is nothing more than another attempt at the classical adages, "the solution to pollution is dilution", and "out of sight, out of mind". No doubt the politicians kicked all their science advisors out of the boardroom; not one water quality specialist in their right mind would go along with this.
Hey zboss, you don't have an official weblink to these jokers do you? I'd like to look it over, and disseminate it amongst all my scientist pals.