SparticleBrane
Contributor
Something tells me that the people who sign up for his course have an idea that it won't just be your average course.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
O2BBubbleFree:I think that it's important to point out that you are in a university program. Don’t get me wrong, I think university programs are great, but being a part of the universities Phys Ed department means that the program must have high phys ed requirements.
![]()
ams511:PADI is going where the money is. Middle-aged people with money to spend on diving and equipment. These people tend not to be in peak fitness. The starving college student market is not their primary goal (most uni programs are NAUI) because they do not have the money to spend on lessons and equipment. I know PADI does not sell equipment but lets face it, PAID is allied with the equipment manufacturers. More people diving = more money for all involved, that is why you see the bar being lowered.
ams511:You are naive my friend. Look at Sport Diver magazine the official magazine of the PADI diving society. Nothing but paid equipment reviews and dive travel. PADI is a franchise like McDonalds they need to certify shops to make certs and for the shop to survive it needs to sell equipment. The two goes hand in hand. I have certs from 3 agencies: PADI, NAUI, TDI. PADI OW from a dive shop, NAUI AOW and Rescue from a university, and TDI nitrox from and independent instructor. What agencies require their instructors to be certify through a dive shop? Also if PADI decided tomorrow to require all teaching through a dive shop then the independent instructors would just cross-over to another agency so PADI would loose their certs.
With all due respect, and I mean that sincerely, youve hung up on a piece of educational jargon, task load that is used with different intents. I use it to help people to discover their real potential and not be limited by the paucity that the agency pundits would have you believe them capable of, not in a militaristic or macho form at all. I am just following in the footsteps of folks whove been doing this, in much the same way, with I hope the same success they had for over half a century.O2BBubbleFree:Oh. Sorry 'bout that. I got this thread confused with a previous one where you were using the task loading that your scientists might experience to justify your training standards.
Underwater Scientists are not professional divers, as defined by the Federal Government. What they do underwater is a tiny fraction of their time.O2BBubbleFree:I guess that was my bad. I define 'professional' divers as those that use diving to accomplish a task, where recreational divers are those that use diving as an end in itself. And, of course, by definition, if they are paid to go underwater, they're professional divers.
Actually I think youll find me one of the most nurturing instructors out there. Yes Im proud of my students and what they accomplish, especially since this is often the first significant physical challenge that many of them have undertaken, remember, in large part these are folks who in grade school resigned themselves to the trappings and culture of being nerds and geeks, they were rarely jocks. Yes Im frustrated by the posturing and BS that is put out that says folks cant do this and thats impossible. I know better. And its not that Im some miracle worker with a magic cure. Im just a guy who learned a set of techniques and an approach to teaching diving by sitting at the flippers of the past masters. I am, perhaps, one of the few to have tried to carry this to the public, a public that finds it difficult to believe and thus miscatalogs it as some kind of special warfare ninja diver crap, which its not, although it has been pushed back by the marketing experts to only remain in a few pockets in higher education and the LA County Advanced Program.O2BBubbleFree:And you seem to be an arrogant *****, which I'm sure you're not in person, so I guess we should both know better than to judge solely on informal written communication.![]()
Please reread my post, confidence building is a small part of what were doing there. If all youre talking about is confidence building, sure there are lots of techniques, and I try and use them all. But whenever I can kill two birds with one stone (figuratively) I try and do so.O2BBubbleFree:No, actually, you could answer my earlier questions as to what purpose a long surface swim test accomplishes. Your answer seems to be just that of a confidence builder, and Im of the opinion that there are other methods to build confidence that are more suitable for diving.
Again, with all due respect, I hardly think of 450 yds, swum with a gentle elementary back-stroke or side-stroke as requiring a high level of physical stamina, if you do ... then we'll just have to agree to disagree, but I'd suggest, without any arrogance intended, only concern for your welfare, that you carefully examine the physical exertion level that diving may require and perhaps join us in a daily exercise program.O2BBubbleFree:If a high level of physical stamina is required for the kind of diving a diver wishes to undertake, then they should certainly meet that need. However, that should be considered advanced diving, and is not necessary for OW classes.
Interesting. My son is in fifth grade; in fourth grade he did do a little algebra, some geometry and a research paper. I guess hes a year slow.friscuba:So back in the third grade, what if along with the multiplication tables and basic spelling, the teacher decided to throw in a little algebra or geometry and research paper writing and make it required to move on to the fourth grade?
The swimming skills listed earlier were quite similar to the DM requirements of several agencies. OW certification as little more than grades one through three or four in terms of a typical education.